CVE Intelligence
High Memory corruption

CVE-2026-64201 — Out-of-bounds Write in Ni Labview

There is a memory corruption vulnerability recently discovered in NI LabVIEW that may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution.  Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI.  This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q3 (26.3.0) and prior versions.

Published Aug 25, 2026 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database · CNA: security@ni.com

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • Technical severity (high)+6

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
—
No EPSS score.
Affects
Ni
Labview
CVSS base
7.8
High · 1 source(s)

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

  • Documented patch — www.ni.com (NIST National Vulnerability Database)

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Ni Labview).
  2. Apply the fixed version or the patch documented under Remediation.
  3. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Ni Labview version 2025-q3version 2024-q3_patch3version 2024-q3_patch4version 2024-q3_patch5version 2024-q3_patch6version 2025-q1version 2025-q1_patch1version 2025-q1_patch2
and 27 more version 2025-q1_patch3version 2024-q3_patch2version 2025-q3_patch1version 2025-q3_patch2version 2025-q3_patch3version 2025-q3_patch4version 2026-q1version 2026-q1_patch1version 2026-q1_patch2version 2026-q3version 2023-q3_patch7version 2023-q1version 2023-q3version 2023-q3_patch1version 2023-q3_patch2version 2023-q3_patch3version 2023-q3_patch4version 2023-q3_patch5version 2023-q3_patch6≤ 2022version 2023-q3_patch8version 2023-q3_patch9version 2024version 2024-q1version 2024-q1_patch1version 2024-q3version 2024-q3_patch1
Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
8.5 CVSS 4.0 High — — security@ni.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.8 CVSS 3.1 High 1.8 5.9 security@ni.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: security@ni.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

Other CVEs with this weakness →

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
  • Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
endpoint telemetry (EDR)crash dumps

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Record published
    Oct 15, 2026
  • Fix documented
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVSS changed · 7.8
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Analyzed
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVE published
    Aug 25, 2026 · security@ni.com

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Ni
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-787
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-64204 Out-of-bounds Write in Ni Labview Aug 25, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-64202 Out-of-bounds Write in Ni Labview Aug 25, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-64203 Out-of-bounds Write in Ni Labview Aug 25, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-18445 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Ni Labview Aug 25, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-16234 Out-of-bounds Read in Ni Labview Aug 25, 2026
  • High CVE-2026-18444 There is an integer conversion vulnerability resulting in an out-of-bounds read when… Aug 25, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No FIRST EPSS score.
  • No CISA SSVC assessment.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-64201 is "Out-of-bounds Write in Ni Labview", rated High. It affects Labview (Ni); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.8 describes technical severity. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.