CVE Intelligence
Unknown

CVE-2026-68437 — drm/imagination: Fit paired fragment job in the correct CCCB

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/imagination: Fit paired fragment job in the correct CCCB For geometry jobs with a paired fragment job, at the moment, the DRM scheduler's prepare_job() callback: - checks for internal (driver) dependencies for the geometry job; - calls into pvr_queue_get_paired_frag_job_dep() to check for external dependencies for the fragment job (the two jobs are submitted together but the common scheduler code doesn't know about it, so this needs to be done at this point in time); - calls into the prepare_job() callback again, but for the fragment job, to check its internal dependencies as well, passing the fragment job's drm_sched_job and the geometry job's drm_sched_entity / pvr_queue. The problem with the last step is that pvr_queue_prepare_job() doesn't always take the mismatched fragment job and geometry queue into account, in particular when checking whether there is space for the fragment command to be submitted, so the code ends up checking for space in the geometry (i.e. wrong) CCCB. The rest of the nested prepare_job() callback happens to work fine at the moment as the other internal dependencies are not relevant for a paired fragment job. Move the initialisation of a paired fragment job's done fence and CCCB fence to pvr_queue_get_paired_frag_job_dep(), inferring the correct queue from the fragment job itself. This fixes cases where prepare_job() wrongly assumed that there was enough space for a paired fragment job in its own CCCB, unblocking run_job(), which then returned early without writing the full sequence of commands to the CCCB. The above lead to kernel warnings such as the following and potentially job timeouts (depending on waiters on the missing commands): [ 552.421075] WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_cccb.c:178 at pvr_cccb_write_command_with_header+0x2c4/0x330 [powervr], CPU#2: kworker/u16:5/63 [ 552.421230] Modules linked in: [ 552.421592] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 63 Comm: kworker/u16:5 Tainted: G W 7.0.0-rc2-gc5d053e4dccb #39 PREEMPT [ 552.421625] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 552.421637] Hardware name: Texas Instruments AM625 SK (DT) [ 552.421655] Workqueue: powervr-sched drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 552.421744] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 552.421766] pc : pvr_cccb_write_command_with_header+0x2c4/0x330 [powervr] [ 552.421850] lr : pvr_queue_submit_job_to_cccb+0x57c/0xa74 [powervr] [ 552.421923] sp : ffff800084c47650 [ 552.421936] x29: ffff800084c47740 x28: 0000000000000df8 x27: ffff800088a77000 [ 552.421979] x26: 0000000000000030 x25: ffff800084c47680 x24: 0000000000001000 [ 552.422017] x23: ffff800084c47820 x22: 1ffff00010988ecc x21: 0000000000000008 [ 552.422055] x20: 0000000000000208 x19: ffff000006ad5a88 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 552.422093] x17: 0000000020020000 x16: 0000000000020000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 552.422130] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 552.422167] x11: 000000000000f2f2 x10: 00000000f3000000 x9 : 00000000f3f3f3f3 [ 552.422204] x8 : 00000000f2f2f200 x7 : ffff700010988ecc x6 : 0000000000000008 [ 552.422241] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 1ffff0001114ee00 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 552.422278] x2 : 0000000000000007 x1 : 0000000000000fff x0 : 000000000000002f [ 552.422316] Call trace: [ 552.422330] pvr_cccb_write_command_with_header+0x2c4/0x330 [powervr] (P) [ 552.422411] pvr_queue_submit_job_to_cccb+0x57c/0xa74 [powervr] [ 552.422486] pvr_queue_run_job+0x3a4/0x990 [powervr] [ 552.422562] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x580/0xd48 [gpu_sched] [ 552.422623] process_one_work+0x520/0x1288 [ 552.422657] worker_thread+0x3f0/0xb3c [ 552.422679] kthread+0x334/0x3d8 [ 552.422706] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Published Aug 11, 2026 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: Linux

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.16%
ahead of 5% of scored CVEs · Oct 30, 2026
Affects
Linux
Linux
CVSS base
—
Score not published yet.

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Linux Linux ≥ eaf01ee5ba28b97f96a3d3eec4c5fbfb37ee4cde and < 15a9863929206911a08b6f62de9c5da6931dbc9e≥ eaf01ee5ba28b97f96a3d3eec4c5fbfb37ee4cde and < e2c29d51c0f65459ae5bbf7ccc302df4c359c473≥ eaf01ee5ba28b97f96a3d3eec4c5fbfb37ee4cde and < 4ddf82c18ee4b3d14ec7fa002c4039b46c961abc≥ eaf01ee5ba28b97f96a3d3eec4c5fbfb37ee4cde and < 4baf9e70cb756d78dd56419f8baee2978a72d0c3version 6.8 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 30, 2026 · 15 reading(s) · max 0.16%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
application logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Record published
    Oct 15, 2026
  • Affected products added · linux/linux
    Oct 15, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Source status changed · → Received
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVE published
    Aug 11, 2026 · Linux

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Linux
every CVE for this vendor

Related CVEs (same products)

  • CVE-2026-99216 Drivers: hv: Don't reset VMBus connection state on error/exit paths 2d
  • CVE-2026-99215 power: supply: core: prevent unregistering a power supply while a callback runs 2d
  • CVE-2026-99207 scsi: target: Disable interrupts while holding delayed_cmd_lock 2d
  • CVE-2026-99208 drm/xe/oa: Zero OA buffer at allocation 2d
  • CVE-2026-99209 drm/xe: skip eviction of a BO with no resource 2d
  • CVE-2026-99210 accel/rocket: clear rdev on device init failure 2d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No CISA SSVC assessment.
  • No CWE classification.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-68437 is "drm/imagination: Fit paired fragment job in the correct CCCB", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.16% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.