CVE-2026-72392 — ipv6: fib6: fix NULL deref in fib6_walk_continue() on multi-batch dump
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: fib6: fix NULL deref in fib6_walk_continue() on multi-batch dump inet6_dump_fib() saves its progress in cb->args[1] as a positional index within the current hash chain. Between batches, a concurrent fib6_new_table() can insert a new table at the chain head, shifting all existing entries. The saved index then lands on a different table, causing fib6_dump_table() to set w->root to the wrong table while w->node still points into the previous one. fib6_walk_continue() dereferences w->node->parent (NULL) and panics: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 RIP: 0010:fib6_walk_continue+0x6e/0x170 Call Trace: <TASK> fib6_dump_table.isra.0+0xc5/0x240 inet6_dump_fib+0xf6/0x420 rtnl_dumpit+0x30/0xa0 netlink_dump+0x15b/0x460 netlink_recvmsg+0x1d6/0x2a0 ____sys_recvmsg+0x17a/0x190 Fix by storing tb->tb6_id in cb->args[1] instead of a positional index. On resume, skip entries until the id matches; a concurrent head-insert can never match the saved id, so the walker always resumes on the correct table.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < ee73a32dd258d4af66831ff006b771e19812b322≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < 89f9c5fee3c64c5cabc34e65599308fd3c879cf9≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < cb90a774a9c6c46961a44949a246fbb61f5f934c≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < 27210d433a8c5fe6bf7278a04bbaeb49a81d0290≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < 059efb48dd746518898faaa9b965511009b59639≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < d8a01d27873e04bebd357dc87859aa756e0b28b2≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < 110ccbd28c9444866fcc84ba96a2ad64fa6e95ae≥ 1b43af5480c351dbcb2eef478bafe179cbeb6e83 and < 9facb861dc6b9b9ea9793ef5032a9a826f7a4229 and 1 moreversion 2.6.19 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 29, 2026 · 14 reading(s) · max 0.22%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
8 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/27210d433a8c5fe6bf7278a04bbaeb49a81d0290
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/89f9c5fee3c64c5cabc34e65599308fd3c879cf9
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb90a774a9c6c46961a44949a246fbb61f5f934c
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/110ccbd28c9444866fcc84ba96a2ad64fa6e95ae
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/059efb48dd746518898faaa9b965511009b59639
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee73a32dd258d4af66831ff006b771e19812b322
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8a01d27873e04bebd357dc87859aa756e0b28b2
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/9facb861dc6b9b9ea9793ef5032a9a826f7a4229
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-99216 Drivers: hv: Don't reset VMBus connection state on error/exit paths 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99215 power: supply: core: prevent unregistering a power supply while a callback runs 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99207 scsi: target: Disable interrupts while holding delayed_cmd_lock 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99208 drm/xe/oa: Zero OA buffer at allocation 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99209 drm/xe: skip eviction of a BO with no resource 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99210 accel/rocket: clear rdev on device init failure 2d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-72392 is "ipv6: fib6: fix NULL deref in fib6_walk_continue() on multi-batch dump", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.22% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.