CVE-2026-80761 — Bluetooth: ISO: zero the sockaddr before returning it in getname
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: ISO: zero the sockaddr before returning it in getname iso_sock_getname() fills a struct sockaddr_iso in place and returns its size without clearing it first, so bytes it does not write are copied to user space from the kernel stack. The getsockname(2) and getpeername(2) paths both run through do_getsockname(), which hands getname() an uninitialized sockaddr_storage on the stack and copies back up to the number of bytes getname() returns, so the driver has to initialize every byte it accounts for. Two ranges are left uninitialized: - struct sockaddr_iso is 10 bytes but only 9 are written (family, iso_bdaddr, iso_bdaddr_type), leaking the trailing pad byte on every call. - for a broadcast peer (BIS_LINK or PA_LINK) the returned length grows by sizeof(struct sockaddr_iso_bc), but only bc_sid, bc_num_bis and bc_bis are filled; bc_bdaddr and bc_bdaddr_type, the first 7 bytes of that structure, are never written. An unprivileged process can open a BTPROTO_ISO socket and reach the pad leak with getsockname(); the broadcast leak needs an established BIS/PA connection. l2cap and rfcomm already memset their sockaddr in getname for the same reason; do the same here.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | ≥ ccf74f2390d60a2f9a75ef496d2564abb478f46a and < 1f6d1f2611af0eb36b133a41d29ffd2cc2601615≥ ccf74f2390d60a2f9a75ef496d2564abb478f46a and < 9069be87c67f290783b332c4284e09fb89cb9ea7≥ ccf74f2390d60a2f9a75ef496d2564abb478f46a and < 190b719b787eb4ca6c25b12fab224806f9108b06≥ ccf74f2390d60a2f9a75ef496d2564abb478f46a and < 884cf2cc957da7ac178a0e6c6c69ddfec0481cc8version 6.0≥ ccf74f2390d60a2f9a75ef496d2564abb478f46a and < 90be10604936c9042dc6238d8836abafca471811≥ ccf74f2390d60a2f9a75ef496d2564abb478f46a and < 554594d032aa4356ca4be75d0cb46e13d350dbd2 | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 26, 2026 · 11 reading(s) · max 0.22%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 2× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 21, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
8 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/554594d032aa4356ca4be75d0cb46e13d350dbd2
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/884cf2cc957da7ac178a0e6c6c69ddfec0481cc8
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/90be10604936c9042dc6238d8836abafca471811
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/9069be87c67f290783b332c4284e09fb89cb9ea7
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80761
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-xhh3-4cvw-88vv
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/190b719b787eb4ca6c25b12fab224806f9108b06
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f6d1f2611af0eb36b133a41d29ffd2cc2601615
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-99092 riscv: patch: fix handling of bpf-jit execmem addresses 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99093 mm: don't schedule deferred kernel page table freeing while booting 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99095 drm/vc4: drain the hangcheck timer and works on V3D unbind 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99096 io_uring/register: don't exempt disabled rings from task restrictions 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99097 tee: shm: reject zero-sized allocations in tee_dyn_shm_alloc_helper() 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99098 dm-integrity: fix buffer overflow in inline mode with large tag size 1d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-80761 is "Bluetooth: ISO: zero the sockaddr before returning it in getname", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.22% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.