CVE-2026-80846 — xfrm: drop ESP-in-TCP packets with no ingress device
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: drop ESP-in-TCP packets with no ingress device ESP-in-TCP receives records through the TCP strparser. handle_esp() restores skb->dev from the saved skb_iif before passing the packet into the XFRM input path. Queued TCP data can be processed after the original ingress device has been removed, for example during veth or net namespace teardown. In that case dev_get_by_index_rcu() returns NULL. The XFRM IPv4 and IPv6 input paths both expect skb->dev to be valid while building the route lookup, so queued ESP-in-TCP data can dereference a NULL device. Drop the packet if the saved ingress device can no longer be resolved. Such a packet can no longer be routed through the normal XFRM receive path, and this preserves the existing behaviour for packets whose ingress device still exists.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < 239d0f71af09dc2029fd4d730cb24b8c83aaa43a≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < f00235f9d12301183d61f75fbe4105506f3e5140≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < 6af5cdb03819a5ce6e945992635c6c5e91045367≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < 2dd1609cadff46c4b20ce53b91ab9cce1380456a≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < c296d25efbc840be24de83f56d43bc47e714ace9≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < 328e40aa774b446969c69b654c52a051a95af8a1≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < 7911e0236616487b89db6bd3ba3f408abd10eb23≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < 943d95233b8b4a88994e244fcf466f8c403d63f1 and 2 more≥ e27cca96cd68fa2c6814c90f9a1cfd36bb68c593 and < e1d7c5ac1c246ce5775f604515de0a59fbf2116eversion 5.6 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 26, 2026 · 11 reading(s) · max 0.20%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
11 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/328e40aa774b446969c69b654c52a051a95af8a1
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/943d95233b8b4a88994e244fcf466f8c403d63f1
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1d7c5ac1c246ce5775f604515de0a59fbf2116e
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/7911e0236616487b89db6bd3ba3f408abd10eb23
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/2dd1609cadff46c4b20ce53b91ab9cce1380456a
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/f00235f9d12301183d61f75fbe4105506f3e5140
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/239d0f71af09dc2029fd4d730cb24b8c83aaa43a
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/c296d25efbc840be24de83f56d43bc47e714ace9
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/6af5cdb03819a5ce6e945992635c6c5e91045367
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-7qhp-m2hr-xxjv
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80846
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-99092 riscv: patch: fix handling of bpf-jit execmem addresses 14h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99093 mm: don't schedule deferred kernel page table freeing while booting 14h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99095 drm/vc4: drain the hangcheck timer and works on V3D unbind 14h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99096 io_uring/register: don't exempt disabled rings from task restrictions 14h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99097 tee: shm: reject zero-sized allocations in tee_dyn_shm_alloc_helper() 14h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99098 dm-integrity: fix buffer overflow in inline mode with large tag size 14h
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-80846 is "xfrm: drop ESP-in-TCP packets with no ingress device", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.20% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.