CVE-2026-80904 — net/tls: Fail tls_sw_splice_read() after a failed async decrypt
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: Fail tls_sw_splice_read() after a failed async decrypt When an async decrypt fails, tls_decrypt_done() records the error in ctx->async_wait.err and calls tls_err_abort(), which stores it in sk_err. tls_sw_recvmsg() and tls_sw_read_sock() each read async_wait.err once they hold the reader lock and fail the call: a record that did not authenticate breaks the connection. tls_sw_splice_read() has no such check, and sk_err does not stand in for one. tls_rx_rec_wait() tests sk_err only inside the loop it skips whenever a record is already parsed, and the first reader to reach sock_error() clears it, while async_wait.err persists. A splice therefore keeps delivering records on a connection that recvmsg() and read_sock() refuse to read. Read async_wait.err in tls_sw_splice_read() as the other two readers do.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | ≥ f314bfee81b1bf8e01168177b2f65f24eb8da63a and < a808aadff634c7a408b2ab84d5919e9a741fdb5b≥ f314bfee81b1bf8e01168177b2f65f24eb8da63a and < 06c2a53604fa1dc4820063828d7dadb3675b7af8≥ f314bfee81b1bf8e01168177b2f65f24eb8da63a and < 18ae1e95f20867106a28820c208a9cec99dda861≥ f314bfee81b1bf8e01168177b2f65f24eb8da63a and < 82d9269f01ebfd835b6256aa17016a974cbbc647≥ f314bfee81b1bf8e01168177b2f65f24eb8da63a and < 4b177911eb9f799e9841c2f87c75b08cb112757a≥ f314bfee81b1bf8e01168177b2f65f24eb8da63a and < 976df67f463db1fddaf2a32fb04f57ad2891a23dversion 5.19 | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 26, 2026 · 11 reading(s) · max 0.16%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
6 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/82d9269f01ebfd835b6256aa17016a974cbbc647
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/18ae1e95f20867106a28820c208a9cec99dda861
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b177911eb9f799e9841c2f87c75b08cb112757a
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/06c2a53604fa1dc4820063828d7dadb3675b7af8
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/976df67f463db1fddaf2a32fb04f57ad2891a23d
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/a808aadff634c7a408b2ab84d5919e9a741fdb5b
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-99092 riscv: patch: fix handling of bpf-jit execmem addresses 23h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99093 mm: don't schedule deferred kernel page table freeing while booting 23h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99095 drm/vc4: drain the hangcheck timer and works on V3D unbind 23h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99096 io_uring/register: don't exempt disabled rings from task restrictions 23h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99097 tee: shm: reject zero-sized allocations in tee_dyn_shm_alloc_helper() 23h
- Unknown CVE-2026-99098 dm-integrity: fix buffer overflow in inline mode with large tag size 23h
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-80904 is "net/tls: Fail tls_sw_splice_read() after a failed async decrypt", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.16% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.