CVE Intelligence
Medium Memory corruption

CVE-2026-89208 — A vulnerability has been identified in Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 (All versions),...

A vulnerability has been identified in Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 (All versions), Capital Embedded AR Classic R20-11 (All versions < V2303), Desigo PXC00-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC00-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC001-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC100-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC12-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC128-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC200-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC22-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC22.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC36.1-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC50-E.D (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXC64-U (All versions >= V2.3), Desigo PXM20-E (All versions >= V2.3). The affected product does not properly validate input bounds before accessing packet data. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger memory reads outside the intended packet boundaries.

Published Oct 13, 2026 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: siemens

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.4% (30-day exploitation probability)+5
  • Technical severity (medium)+3
  • Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.42%
ahead of 35% of scored CVEs · Oct 15, 2026
Affects
Siemens
Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 and 14 more
CVSS base
5.3
Medium · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
Yes
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Siemens Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422, Siemens Capital Embedded AR Classic R20-11, Siemens Desigo PXC00-E.D…).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  4. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (memory corruption), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Siemens Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 versions not specified by the source Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Capital Embedded AR Classic R20-11 < V2303 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC00-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC00-U ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC001-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC100-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC12-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC128-U ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC200-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC22-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC22.1-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC36.1-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC50-E.D ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXC64-U ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Siemens Desigo PXM20-E ≥ V2.3 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
6.9 CVSS 4.0 Medium — — productcert@siemens.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.9 CVSS 4.0 Medium — — siemens via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
5.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium 3.9 1.4 productcert@siemens.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
5.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
5.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — siemens via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N (score shown at the top: productcert@siemens.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 14, 2026 → Oct 15, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.42%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
  • Correlate service crashes/restarts with inbound traffic; repeated crashes may indicate attempts.
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPSendpoint telemetry (EDR)crash dumps

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Source status changed · Received → Awaiting Analysis
    Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Affected products added · siemens/capital embedded ar classic 431-422, siemens/capital embedded ar classic r20-11, siemens/desigo pxc00-e.d, sieme
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 5.3
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Received
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • CVE published
    Oct 13, 2026 · siemens

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× References added · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

4 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Siemens
every CVE for this vendor
CWE-125
other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-89208 is "A vulnerability has been identified in Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 (All versions),...", rated Medium. It affects Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 (Siemens); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 5.3 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.42% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.