CVE-2026-89525 — udf: reject VAT indexes equal to the entry count
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udf: reject VAT indexes equal to the entry count UDF 1.50 virtual partition mapping uses the VAT as an array of physical block mappings. s_num_entries stores the number of entries in that array, not the highest valid index. The valid VAT indexes are therefore below s_num_entries. udf_get_pblock_virt15() currently rejects only indexes greater than s_num_entries. A crafted image can request index s_num_entries, pass the bounds check, and make the kernel read one entry past the allocated VAT table. Change the check to reject block >= s_num_entries, so the count is handled as an exclusive upper bound. A crafted UDF image reproduced this on origin/master commit 0e35b9b6ec0ffcc5e23cbdec09f5c622ad532b53 with a KASAN slab-out-of-bounds report in udf_get_pblock_virt15(). Trail of Bits has a reproducer that triggers kernel panic demonstrating the bug, and can share it if needed.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < f64e01a90326bb85a3cc8aa0199931dc2f15b589≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 8a8c1c42a34349a0626d910abbad5a29136446b7≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 19f36c6453cd88fe6d60ef36ab1f1cad8ddf4ce4≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < b77b83f5529a26d084d64ece98abd6f0cc86e053≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 9193368408d792cec2057628d87862140fb1ce1c≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < b95c33a4e743874f1b0a45bf2aaa4da553552bd1≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < 1bd7947f1463c21edafa256d0fbec5b99215e2b6≥ 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and < cac0cb07f29ccfb373fd4a36c81e908ef3ce608c and 1 moreversion 2.6.12 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 23, 2026 · 8 reading(s) · max 0.18%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
10 on the record
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89525
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/1bd7947f1463c21edafa256d0fbec5b99215e2b6
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/cac0cb07f29ccfb373fd4a36c81e908ef3ce608c
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/19f36c6453cd88fe6d60ef36ab1f1cad8ddf4ce4
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/f64e01a90326bb85a3cc8aa0199931dc2f15b589
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/b77b83f5529a26d084d64ece98abd6f0cc86e053
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a8c1c42a34349a0626d910abbad5a29136446b7
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/9193368408d792cec2057628d87862140fb1ce1c
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/b95c33a4e743874f1b0a45bf2aaa4da553552bd1
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-383p-4f3r-q68w
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-99086 dm-integrity: validate the superblock on resume 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99087 dm-integrity: fix NULL pointer dereference when the 'R' flag is used 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99080 fs: Free any excess xarray nodes in clear_inode() 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99084 readdir: take no inode lock on an immutable directory 1d
- Unknown CVE-2026-99085 sched_ext: Fix CPU hotplug hang when a dying CPU's tasks sit in the BPF scheduler 1d
- Critical CVE-2026-99079 net/mlx5e: Prevent stale XSK buffer release on refill retry 1d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-89525 is "udf: reject VAT indexes equal to the entry count", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.18% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.