CVE-2026-89864 — scsi: qla2xxx: Bound i2c->length in I2C bsg handlers
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: qla2xxx: Bound i2c->length in I2C bsg handlers struct qla_i2c_access carries a 16-bit length field alongside a fixed 64-byte buffer: struct qla_i2c_access { uint16_t device, offset, option, length; uint8_t buffer[0x40]; } __packed; qla2x00_write_i2c() and qla2x00_read_i2c() use the user-supplied i2c->length without any bounds check. i2c is overlaid on a 256-byte on-stack buffer and sfp is a 256-byte DMA-pool buffer, so a length up to 65535 overruns both: - write: memcpy(sfp, i2c->buffer, i2c->length) over-reads the stack and over-writes the sfp heap buffer, and qla2x00_write_sfp() then DMAs i2c->length bytes out of the 256-byte buffer. - read: qla2x00_read_sfp() DMAs i2c->length bytes into the 256-byte sfp, then memcpy(i2c->buffer, sfp, i2c->length) overflows the 64-byte buffer inside the on-stack array. A caller holding CAP_SYS_RAWIO can use this to corrupt the heap and the kernel stack. Reject requests whose length exceeds the buffer before any copy or DMA transfer in both handlers.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+2
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 8f01f886cc5e7bbc16cbf1a9928fdebbc911e973≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 2be39946abcde5a6416fb074ef728429e246a996≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 522d6dcdc645d8f97d6b4cdfd6d8eea307f3ff0e≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 9a756f277eb89f769dbf380f38245c270d31fdb5≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 32d6df14fdab71fe1ba304fd9a0db0411ea2e043≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 97ca58b0fb026799b99e3d552d5f69cf9a3113ad≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 47049fdadc0eaa115e813735b827e1379c0d2cf8≥ 9ebb5d9c69f1f5721f9f6f49e501c674c1e184ae and < 0918ee2c0eeb4d7f45b82b3dc11e65c2d9b7ad59 and 1 moreversion 3.7 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 20, 2026 · 5 reading(s) · max 0.21%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
10 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/47049fdadc0eaa115e813735b827e1379c0d2cf8
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-vhpc-fmr8-vgcc
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/32d6df14fdab71fe1ba304fd9a0db0411ea2e043
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/2be39946abcde5a6416fb074ef728429e246a996
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a756f277eb89f769dbf380f38245c270d31fdb5
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/522d6dcdc645d8f97d6b4cdfd6d8eea307f3ff0e
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f01f886cc5e7bbc16cbf1a9928fdebbc911e973
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/97ca58b0fb026799b99e3d552d5f69cf9a3113ad
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89864
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/0918ee2c0eeb4d7f45b82b3dc11e65c2d9b7ad59
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-98867 dm-pcache: bound the logical key offset from persistent memory 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98868 dm-pcache: reject a kset that overruns its segment 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98866 sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp to fix UAF 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98856 kprobes: Skip disarmed probes when checking optkprobe overlap 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98857 ipvs: bound LBLCR and LBLC cache growth 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98858 io_uring: fix task_work add use-after-free with SQPOLL 2d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-89864 is "scsi: qla2xxx: Bound i2c->length in I2C bsg handlers", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.21% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.