CVE-2026-89900 — media: cec: core: Fix kmemleak due to missed rc_free_device() call
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: cec: core: Fix kmemleak due to missed rc_free_device() call The commit dccc0c3ddf8f ("media: rc: fix race between unregister and urb/irq callbacks") removed the implicit call to rc_free_device() from rc_unregister_device(). However, the commit missed to remove the NULL assignment of adap->rc that is now causing rc_free_device() to never be called on an allocated rc device. kmemleak reports following after e.g. dw-hdmi unbind: unreferenced object 0xffff00010ac10000 (size 4096): comm "kworker/u16:1", pid 39, jiffies 4294897739 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 20 23 4b 0a 01 00 ff ff 08 00 c1 0a 01 00 ff ff #K............. 08 00 c1 0a 01 00 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace (crc e11baccc): kmemleak_alloc+0x38/0x44 __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x4a8/0x5e0 rc_allocate_device+0x48/0x2a0 cec_allocate_adapter+0x3ac/0x800 dw_hdmi_cec_probe+0x264/0x634 platform_probe+0xc0/0x188 really_probe+0x4a4/0x8e0 __driver_probe_device+0x2f8/0x440 driver_probe_device+0x60/0x160 __device_attach_driver+0x1a0/0x2a0 bus_for_each_drv+0x100/0x1a0 __device_attach+0x174/0x350 device_initial_probe+0x90/0xb0 bus_probe_device+0x4c/0x120 device_add+0xdec/0x116c platform_device_add+0x354/0x598 Remove the assignment of adap->rc to NULL to let cec_delete_adapter() free the allocated rc device after last user of the cec device exits to fix the kmemleak.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
≥ a7becb58f6b8a3a3efe5d3acfd52e2c107de6772 and < 954ee95a03b4d31d4505591bfaba02c24b75776b≥ 75977f5f5c4974c72bbedefbf09ad33ebbaa36f1 and < f28a8e1ba4d67a18e4662e5acefd5a4389322366≥ e250b672d40a9e0d97a8895cbb301248bea0fce6 and < 695063fc57574dd117b1bc750ca189cf03a2caad≥ dccc0c3ddf8f16071736f98a7d6dd46a2d43e037 and < cca2407794795cecff7f8e5f5a79f4ef6b1d6f6c≥ dccc0c3ddf8f16071736f98a7d6dd46a2d43e037 and < a24ba0653f7154e671dc8d2bf64682ab2d042792≥ 6.6.143 and < 6.6.157≥ 6.12.93 and < 6.12.110≥ 6.18.35 and < 6.18.51 and 1 moreversion 7.1 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 19, 2026 · 4 reading(s) · max 0.20%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× References added · Oct 19, 2026 – Oct 19, 2026
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
7 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/cca2407794795cecff7f8e5f5a79f4ef6b1d6f6c
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-3cp8-qx5m-j98g
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/954ee95a03b4d31d4505591bfaba02c24b75776b
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/695063fc57574dd117b1bc750ca189cf03a2caad
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/a24ba0653f7154e671dc8d2bf64682ab2d042792
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89900
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/f28a8e1ba4d67a18e4662e5acefd5a4389322366
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Unknown CVE-2026-98866 sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp to fix UAF 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98867 dm-pcache: bound the logical key offset from persistent memory 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98868 dm-pcache: reject a kset that overruns its segment 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98856 kprobes: Skip disarmed probes when checking optkprobe overlap 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98857 ipvs: bound LBLCR and LBLC cache growth 2d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98858 io_uring: fix task_work add use-after-free with SQPOLL 2d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-89900 is "media: cec: core: Fix kmemleak due to missed rc_free_device() call", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.20% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.