CVE-2026-9353 — NousResearch hermes-agent Skills Guard Multi-Word Prompt skills_guard.py injection
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.23. Impacted is an unknown function of the file agent/skills_guard.py of the component Skills Guard Multi-Word Prompt Handler. The manipulation of the argument THREAT_PATTERNS leads to injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.5% (30-day exploitation probability)+6
- Technical severity (high)+6
- CISA SSVC: exploitation "poc"+5
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (NousResearch Hermes-agent).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NousResearch | Hermes-agent |
version 2026.4.12version 2026.4.23version 2026.4.22version 2026.4.21version 2026.4.20version 2026.4.19version 2026.4.18version 2026.4.17 and 16 moreversion 2026.4.16version 2026.4.15version 2026.4.14version 2026.4.13version 2026.4.0version 2026.4.11version 2026.4.10version 2026.4.9version 2026.4.8version 2026.4.7version 2026.4.6version 2026.4.5version 2026.4.4version 2026.4.3version 2026.4.2version 2026.4.1 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.9 | CVSS 4.0 | Medium | — | — | VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 5.5 | CVSS 4.0 | Medium | — | — | cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.3 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 3.9 | 3.4 | cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.3 | CVSS 3.1 | High | — | — | VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 7.3 | CVSS 3.0 | High | — | — | VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| 7.5 | CVSS 2.0 | High | 10.0 | 6.4 | cna@vuldb.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 7.5 | CVSS 2.0 | High | — | — | VulDB via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L (score shown at the top: cna@vuldb.com) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.52%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · nousresearch/hermes-agent
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 7.3
- Source status changed · → Deferred
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
4 on the record
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Medium CVE-2026-18993 NousResearch hermes-agent Memory Toolset model_tools.py access control Aug 6, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-18976 NousResearch hermes-agent disabled_toolsets agent_init.py get_tool_definitions privileges assignment Aug 5, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-18775 NousResearch hermes-agent Browser Tooling browser_tool.py browser_snapshot server-side request forgery Aug 4, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-18774 NousResearch hermes-agent xAI Image Generation Provider image_gen_provider.py save_url_image server-side request forgery Aug 4, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-18773 NousResearch hermes-agent Quick run.py _check_slash_access authorization Aug 4, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-17432 NousResearch hermes-agent SimpleX Gateway Authorization adapter.py access control Jul 25, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-9353 is "NousResearch hermes-agent Skills Guard Multi-Word Prompt skills_guard.py injection", rated High. It affects Hermes-agent (NousResearch); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.3 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.52% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.