CVE Intelligence
High CSRF exploit reference

CVE-2026-93631 — Zimbra Collaboration Suite OAuth Extension Cross-Site Request Forgery Enables Account Linking

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth extension of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Network Edition allows an attacker to link an attacker-controlled external account to a victim's mailbox. The OAuth callback does not bind its state value or authorization code to the initiating Zimbra session and instead selects the destination mailbox from the browser's current authentication cookie. On a deployment with the provider configured, an attacker can induce a signed-in victim to load a callback containing a fresh code for the attacker's provider account. This creates a persistent data source that imports attacker-controlled contacts or events. With bidirectional CalDAV synchronization, appointments subsequently created or edited in the linked calendar are also disclosed to the attacker. ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.20 are affected.

Published Oct 23, 2026 · Updated Oct 28, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: rapid7

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
  • Technical severity (high)+6

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.18%
ahead of 7% of scored CVEs · Oct 30, 2026
Affects
Synacor
Zimbra Collaboration Suite
CVSS base
7.1
High · 3 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Zimbra Zimbra Collaboration Suite).
  2. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
  3. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  4. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
  5. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (csrf), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite ≤ 10.1.20 Vulnerable NIST National Vulnerability Database
Zimbra Zimbra Collaboration Suite ≤ 10.1.20 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
7.1 CVSS 3.1 High 2.8 4.2 cve@rapid7.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.1 CVSS 3.1 High — — GitHub, Inc. via GitHub Security Advisories
7.1 CVSS 3.1 High — — rapid7 via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N (score shown at the top: cve@rapid7.com)

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 24, 2026 → Oct 30, 2026 · 7 reading(s) · max 0.18%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
web/proxy/WAF logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · synacor/zimbra collaboration suite
    Oct 28, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · Undergoing Analysis → Analyzed
    Oct 28, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 28, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Source status changed · Awaiting Analysis → Undergoing Analysis
    Oct 24, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · Received → Awaiting Analysis
    Oct 23, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Affected products added · zimbra/zimbra collaboration suite
    Oct 23, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 23, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 7.1
    Oct 23, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Received
    Oct 23, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 23, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
  • CVE published
    Oct 23, 2026 · rapid7

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 2× References added · Oct 23, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026
  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 23, 2026 – Oct 23, 2026

References

5 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Synacor
every CVE for this vendor
CSRF
same class
CWE-352
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • High CVE-2026-93640 Zimbra Collaboration Suite Local Privilege Escalation via Unrestricted zmunbound Sudo Configuration 7d
  • Medium CVE-2026-93634 Zimbra Collaboration Suite Cross-Account Authorization Bypass via Forged Shared-File Records 7d
  • Medium CVE-2026-93633 Zimbra Collaboration Suite Briefcase CSS Sanitization Bypass via Non-ASCII Stylesheet Characters 7d
  • Medium CVE-2026-93638 Zimbra Collaboration Suite Pre-Authentication Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via Login Page zrememberme Parameter 7d
  • Medium CVE-2026-93636 Zimbra Collaboration Suite LDAP Filter Injection via Calendar Resource Attribute Name 7d
  • High CVE-2026-93639 Zimbra Collaboration Suite Missing Authorization in ConfigureZimlet Enables Delegated Administrator Privilege Escalation 7d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-93631 is "Zimbra Collaboration Suite OAuth Extension Cross-Site Request Forgery Enables Account Linking", rated High. It affects Zimbra Collaboration Suite (Synacor); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.1 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.18% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.