CVE-2026-97416 — btrfs: balance: fix potential bg lookup failure in btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk()
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: balance: fix potential bg lookup failure in btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk() [BUG] Running btrfs balance can trigger a null-ptr-deref before relocating a data chunk when metadata corruption leaves a chunk in the chunk tree without a corresponding block group in the in-memory cache: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f] RIP: 0010:btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk+0x40/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3601 Call Trace: __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4217 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x2516/0x42b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4604 btrfs_ioctl_balance fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3577 [inline] btrfs_ioctl+0x25cf/0x5b90 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5313 ... [CAUSE] __btrfs_balance() iterates the on-disk chunk tree and passes the chunk logical bytenr to btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk() before relocating a data chunk. That helper then queries the in-memory block group cache: cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, chunk_offset); chunk_type = cache->flags; /* cache may be NULL */ A corrupt image can contain a chunk item whose matching block group item is missing, so no block group is ever inserted into the cache. In that case btrfs_lookup_block_group() returns NULL. The code only guards this with ASSERT(cache), which becomes a no-op when CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is disabled. The subsequent dereference of cache->flags therefore crashes the kernel. [FIX] Add a NULL check after btrfs_lookup_block_group() in btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk() and print and error message for clarity.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | ≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < 9f37a6d6ae9e998232e2ba091ab4999cdf967e1b≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < e479236a8f4d85c4fb6b3f7c2556c21f583e2bf2≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < 322f891b4d4fe64acb3351a0ffa62a7fa5ba7256≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < 81a664ed8b1a44c76b204c4bd0d751317a02c5cd≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < 9740dd0c17a4be8cc47a06c5ca5293471a7e286e≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < 59f75e0c8724d4adebc08c7dd3ff2358b80c21f7≥ a6f93c71d412ba8ed743152c3a54ad0b78dcd9c7 and < 18d32b0013efba19f7ad3e5b08d7aee813d604a6version 4.16 | Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 16, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.17%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Record published
- Affected products added · linux/linux
- Source status changed · → Received
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026
References
7 on the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f37a6d6ae9e998232e2ba091ab4999cdf967e1b
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/e479236a8f4d85c4fb6b3f7c2556c21f583e2bf2
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/322f891b4d4fe64acb3351a0ffa62a7fa5ba7256
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/18d32b0013efba19f7ad3e5b08d7aee813d604a6
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/59f75e0c8724d4adebc08c7dd3ff2358b80c21f7
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/81a664ed8b1a44c76b204c4bd0d751317a02c5cd
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/9740dd0c17a4be8cc47a06c5ca5293471a7e286e
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- Critical CVE-2026-99999 ipv4: validate checksum_start before completing checksum 3d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98432 ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period 3d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98424 wifi: cfg80211: undo netns switch if renaming the wiphy fails 3d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98425 wifi: mac80211: don't warn when an IBSS has no channel to scan 3d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98426 wifi: mwifiex: fix IRQ leak using wrong index in MSI-X error path 3d
- Unknown CVE-2026-98427 net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call 3d
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No CISA SSVC assessment.
- No CWE classification.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-97416 is "btrfs: balance: fix potential bg lookup failure in btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk()", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.17% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.