Unknown

CVE-2026-97424 — drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq cp_ecc_error_irq is acquired in amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init() but released in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(), so the put site has to query amdgpu_irq_enabled() because the get is skipped on SR-IOV VF. ras_late_init / ras_fini have no suspend counterpart, so move the put to amdgpu_gfx_ras_suspend() / amdgpu_gfx_ras_fini() and add a matching ras_suspend callback that is invoked from amdgpu_ras_suspend() before disable_all_features(). The get and put now sit in the same place and check the same condition (not VF, funcs registered), no refcount querying needed. An active flag gates ras_fini so the suspend-then-unload-without-resume path falls into amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini_default() instead of double-releasing what ras_suspend already cleaned up. Drop the cp_ecc_error_irq put from gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(). gfx_v8_0 manages cp_ecc_error_irq locally and is unaffected; no other GFX generation has this IRQ.

Published Sep 24, 2026 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: Linux

Low

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.

How the score was calculated

EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation

Not confirmed

Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.

EPSS FIRST

0.16%

ahead of 5% of scored CVEs · Oct 16, 2026

Affects

Linux

CVSS base

—

Score not published yet.

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status	Source
Linux	Linux	≥ 760a1d55344d823287850466db893ed77e948803 and < 001824103f2fe6ffd2380afddf81f43b446035b2≥ 760a1d55344d823287850466db893ed77e948803 and < e3829992dd9fa0a82511af4f01733fc854cd15a5version 5.2	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 15, 2026 → Oct 16, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 0.16%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

Not enough vector or weakness data: use the affected application’s logs as a starting point.

application logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

2026
Record published
Oct 15, 2026
Affected products added · linux/linux
Oct 15, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Source status changed · → Received
Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record created in this database
Oct 15, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
CVE published
Sep 24, 2026 · Linux

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

1× Official description updated · Oct 15, 2026 – Oct 15, 2026

References

2 on the record

git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3829992dd9fa0a82511af4f01733fc854cd15a5
NIST National Vulnerability Database
git.kernel.org/stable/c/001824103f2fe6ffd2380afddf81f43b446035b2
NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Linux
every CVE for this vendor

Related CVEs (same products)

Critical CVE-2026-99999 ipv4: validate checksum_start before completing checksum 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-98432 ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-98424 wifi: cfg80211: undo netns switch if renaming the wiphy fails 3d
Unknown CVE-2026-98425 wifi: mac80211: don't warn when an IBSS has no channel to scan 3d
Unknown CVE-2026-98426 wifi: mwifiex: fix IRQ leak using wrong index in MSI-X error path 3d
Unknown CVE-2026-98427 net/sched: codel: bound the dropping loop per dequeue call 3d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No CVSS score published by NVD, the CNA, CISA or GitHub so far.
No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
No CISA SSVC assessment.
No CWE classification.
No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-97424 is "drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq", rated Unknown. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. EPSS 0.16% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.