High

CVE-2026-99018 — riscv: entry: gate shadow call stack reload on sstatus.SPP, not tp

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: entry: gate shadow call stack reload on sstatus.SPP, not tp Under CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK, handle_exception() reloads the kernel shadow call stack pointer (gp) only when the trap came from userspace. It made that decision with scs_load_current_if_task_changed, which compares the trap-time tp (read back from sscratch into s5) against the current tp: beq \prev, tp, _skip_scs scs_load_current _skip_scs: tp is a user-writable register. A user task that sets tp to the linear-map address of its own task_struct (&current) before trapping makes the comparison succeed (can achieve by brute force with KASLR enable under our test), so the kernel skips scs_load_current and keeps running with the gp that userspace left in place. Under CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK gp is the shadow call stack pointer and load_global_pointer is a no-op, so the compiler-emitted "sd ra, -8(gp)" / "ld ra, -8(gp)" in every non-leaf function then write to, and return through, an attacker-controlled address -- an unprivileged kernel arbitrary-write and control-flow-hijack primitive. The poisoned gp is saved to task_struct.scs_sp on return, so the reload is skipped on every subsequent entry as well. Decide "came from userspace" from the hardware sstatus.SPP bit (already in s1 at this point) instead of from tp, mirroring the check that ret_from_exception already uses a few instructions later. SPP is written by hardware on trap entry and cannot be forged from U-mode. Legitimate behaviour is unchanged: user entries (SPP=0) reload the task shadow call stack, nested kernel entries (SPP=1) skip it.

Published Oct 23, 2026 · Updated Oct 24, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP, GitHub Security Advisories · CNA: Linux

Low

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.

How the score was calculated

EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
Technical severity (high)+6

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation

Not confirmed

Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.

EPSS FIRST

0.18%

ahead of 7% of scored CVEs · Oct 30, 2026

Affects

Linux

CVSS base

7.8

High · 2 source(s)

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Linux Linux).
No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status	Source
Linux	Linux	≥ d1584d791a297aa8ed93503382a682a6ecfc4218 and < 6639735367a7d491977e9e5e7afc50b489d81d83≥ d1584d791a297aa8ed93503382a682a6ecfc4218 and < 7d1367a53137e379498eb8791295e58854378636≥ d1584d791a297aa8ed93503382a682a6ecfc4218 and < 37b4401ee6fa06046446d55e97e8d11784080843≥ d1584d791a297aa8ed93503382a682a6ecfc4218 and < 4d0697f192975dab5985e921989be1d85cf580e9version 6.7	Vulnerable	CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector

Local

Attack complexity

Low

Privileges required

Low

User interaction

None

Scope

Unchanged

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Availability

High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Scored by
7.8	CVSS 3.1	High	1.8	5.9	416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 via NIST National Vulnerability Database
7.8	CVSS 3.1	High	—	—	Linux via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67)

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 24, 2026 → Oct 30, 2026 · 7 reading(s) · max 0.21%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.

endpoint telemetry (EDR)

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

2026
CVSS changed · 7.8
Oct 24, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record published
Oct 23, 2026
Affected products added · linux/linux
Oct 23, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Source status changed · → Received
Oct 23, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
Record created in this database
Oct 23, 2026 · Alertas do Telegram
CVE published
Oct 23, 2026 · Linux

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

2× References added · Oct 23, 2026 – Oct 24, 2026
1× Official description updated · Oct 23, 2026 – Oct 23, 2026

References

6 on the record

git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d1367a53137e379498eb8791295e58854378636
NIST National Vulnerability Database
github.com/advisories/GHSA-7x79-hrpm-vw9w
GitHub Security Advisories
git.kernel.org/stable/c/6639735367a7d491977e9e5e7afc50b489d81d83
NIST National Vulnerability Database
git.kernel.org/stable/c/37b4401ee6fa06046446d55e97e8d11784080843
NIST National Vulnerability Database
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-99018
GitHub Security Advisories
git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d0697f192975dab5985e921989be1d85cf580e9
NIST National Vulnerability Database

Elsewhere on this site

Linux
every CVE for this vendor

Related CVEs (same products)

Unknown CVE-2026-99216 Drivers: hv: Don't reset VMBus connection state on error/exit paths 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-99215 power: supply: core: prevent unregistering a power supply while a callback runs 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-99207 scsi: target: Disable interrupts while holding delayed_cmd_lock 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-99208 drm/xe/oa: Zero OA buffer at allocation 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-99209 drm/xe: skip eviction of a BO with no resource 2d
Unknown CVE-2026-99210 accel/rocket: clear rdev on device init failure 2d

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
No CISA SSVC assessment.
No CWE classification.
No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-99018 is "riscv: entry: gate shadow call stack reload on sstatus.SPP, not tp", rated High. It affects Linux (Linux); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.18% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.