CVE Intelligence
Home / CVEs

CVE Database

Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.

Severity
Clear

494 result(s)

Export this search: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-8480 Medium · 4.3 CWE-295 Jul 1, 2026
Connection possible to the Administration portal with a revoked certificate
A vulnerability was discovered on Stormshield Network Security 4.3.0  to 4.3.41 (included), 4.4.0 to 4.8.15 (included) , 5.0.2 EA to 5.0.5 (included) A revoked client certificate can still be used to authenticate to the captive‑admin portal, allowing an attacker who possesses the revoked certificate to gain administrative access.
CVE-2026-12374 Medium · 6.4 CWE-295 Jul 1, 2026
Improper XPC caller certificate validation and TOCTOU race condition in macOS PrivilegedHelperTool
Improper certificate validation and a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the PrivilegedHelperTool XPC service in Cato Client before v.5.13.1 on macOS allows a local authenticated attacker to escalate privileges to root via a self-signed certificate that bypasses the XPC caller verification and a symlink swap during package installation.
CVE-2026-48934 Medium · 4.3 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
A flaw in Node.js TLS host verification can cause an attacker to bypass certification validation....
A flaw in Node.js TLS host verification can cause an attacker to bypass certification validation. This vulnerability affects all supported release lines: **Node.js 22**, **Node.js 24**, and **Node.js 26**.
CVE-2026-7532 High · 7.5 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
iPAddress name constraints not enforced when WOLFSSL_IP_ALT_NAME is undefined
iPAddress name constraints bypass when WOLFSSL_IP_ALT_NAME is not defined. IP address name constraints are not enforced in that configuration, allowing a certificate to bypass an issuing CA's IP address constraints.
CVE-2026-10098 Medium · 5.3 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
OCSP CertID serial-number length-confusion in wolfSSL_OCSP_resp_find_status
OCSP CertID serial-number length-confusion in wolfSSL_OCSP_resp_find_status allows a same-issuer SingleResponse whose serial is a prefix of the target serial to be reported as the revocation status of a different certificate. The lookup compared serial-number bytes without first requiring the two serial numbers to be of equal length, so a SingleResponse for one certificate (same issuer) whose serial is a prefix of the target's serial would match, returning the wrong certificate's status. The fix requires the serial lengths to be equal before comparing the serial bytes.
CVE-2026-6731 High · 7.5 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
X.509 name constraint bypass via Subject CN treated as a DNS name
X.509 name constraint bypass via the Subject Common Name when treated as a DNS-type name. A certificate whose Subject CN violates an issuing CA's DNS name constraints could be accepted.
CVE-2026-6450 Medium · 5.3 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
CRL critical extension bypass in ParseCRL_Extensions
A CRL critical extension bypass exists in ParseCRL_Extensions where critical extensions are not properly enforced, allowing a crafted CRL with an unhandled critical extension to be accepted. This only affects builds with CRL support enabled and where a crafted CRL had a trusted signature when parsed.
CVE-2026-55964 Medium · 5.3 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
Chain intermediate CA:TRUE without keyCertSign accepted as a signing CA (temporary CA exemption)
Chain intermediate CA:TRUE without keyCertSign accepted as a signing CA. Intermediate CA certificates are required to have the keyCertSign key usage when a Key Usage extension is present, but chain-supplied temporary CAs (WOLFSSL_TEMP_CA) added while building a certificate path were previously exempted from this check, so an intermediate asserting CA:TRUE but lacking keyCertSign was accepted as a signing CA. The check now applies to chain-supplied temporary CAs as well; only operator-loaded root certificates (WOLFSSL_USER_CA) and self-signed roots remain exempt. Per RFC 5280 an absent Key Usage extension implies all usages, so the requirement is enforced only when the extension is actually present (extKeyUsageSet). Affects the OpenSSL-compatibility certificate-path-building path (X509_verify_cert / X509_STORE, OPENSSL_EXTRA/OPENSSL_ALL), where untrusted chain intermediates are added as temporary CAs; native (non-OpenSSL-compat) certificate verification does not create temporary CAs and is unaffected. Within those builds, the check applies unless ALLOW_INVALID_CERTSIGN is defined.
CVE-2026-55960 High · 7.5 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
Un-negotiated Raw Public Key (RFC 7250) accepted in place of X.509, bypassing chain validation
Un-negotiated Raw Public Key (RFC 7250) accepted in place of an X.509 certificate, bypassing chain validation. A raw public key has no chain, so ParseCertRelative() accepts it without performing any trust verification; it must therefore only be accepted when RPK was actually negotiated for that peer. The check now defaults the expected type to X.509 (per RFC 7250/8446) when no type was negotiated, comparing against the received server certificate type on the client and the selected client certificate type on the server, and rejects any mismatch, including an un-negotiated raw public key, with UNSUPPORTED_CERTIFICATE. Only affects builds with Raw Public Key support (HAVE_RPK) enabled - disabled by default in a standalone build, but included in --enable-all.
CVE-2026-11310 High · 7.5 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
X.509 trust-chain bypass in wolfSSL_X509_verify_cert() via untrusted intermediate anchoring
X.509 trust-chain bypass in the OpenSSL compatibility certificate verifier (wolfSSL_X509_verify_cert()). This affects only builds with --enable-opensslextra (OPENSSL_EXTRA) and whose application validates certificates by calling X509_verify_cert() with caller-supplied untrusted intermediate certificates; for those users it is critical, otherwise the library is unaffected. In particular, native wolfSSL TLS/DTLS usage is not impacted. wolfSSL's X509_verify_cert() temporarily loads each caller-supplied untrusted intermediate into the certificate manager but failed to drop them before the trusted-store check, so an untrusted intermediate could anchor the path itself. An attacker can present a chain that never reaches a configured trust anchor and have it accepted, resulting in acceptance of an attacker-controlled certificate. This is certificate verification independent of TLS (e.g. S/MIME/CMS, code/firmware signing, JWT/JWS x5c), is not specific to any key type or algorithm, and a single untrusted intermediate suffices. The default wolfSSL TLS handshake (WOLFSSL_VERIFY_PEER) is not affected; only TLS applications doing manual or deferred peer verification through this API are, which also requires --enable-sessioncerts.
CVE-2026-10592 Medium · 5.3 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
Wildcard DNS SAN bypasses CA name-constraint checks
Certificates with wildcard DNS SANs (e.g. *.example.com) bypassed CA name-constraint checks. A certificate with a wildcard DNS SAN that should be rejected by the issuing CA's permitted/excluded DNS name constraints could be accepted.
CVE-2026-6091 Medium · 6.5 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
Partial-chain verification accepts untrusted intermediate as trust anchor
Partial-chain certificate verification may accept chains that terminate at a peer-supplied, untrusted intermediate certificate rather than a trusted anchor. An attacker could present a chain that ends at an intermediate they control and have it accepted as valid. This affects the OpenSSL compatibility certificate-path-building path (wolfSSL_X509_verify_cert / X509_STORE, OPENSSL_EXTRA) when the X509_V_FLAG_PARTIAL_CHAIN verify flag is enabled.
CVE-2026-11999 High · 7.5 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
X.509 trust-chain bypass via path-depth exhaustion in wolfSSL_X509_verify_cert()
X.509 trust-chain bypass (path-depth exhaustion) in the OpenSSL compatibility certificate verifier (wolfSSL_X509_verify_cert()). This affects only builds with --enable-opensslextra whose application calls X509_verify_cert() with caller-supplied untrusted intermediates; for those users it is critical, otherwise the library is unaffected. Native wolfSSL TLS/DTLS usage is not impacted. X509_verify_cert() returned success based only on the last verified link rather than on reaching a trust anchor: when the supplied chain is deeper than the verifier's maximum path depth (default 100), path building runs out of depth while still walking untrusted intermediates and the chain is accepted even though it never reaches a configured trust anchor, allowing acceptance of an attacker-controlled certificate. The default TLS handshake (WOLFSSL_VERIFY_PEER) is not affected; only applications doing manual or deferred verification through this API are.
CVE-2026-46734 High · 7.8 CWE-295 Jun 25, 2026
Improper Certificate Validation in Dell Display And Peripheral Manager
Dell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Mac), versions prior to 2.3, contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.
CVE-2026-57289 Medium · 4.8 CWE-295 Jun 24, 2026
Improper Certificate Validation in Jenkins Bitbucket Push And Pull Request
Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin 3.3.8 and earlier unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for connections sending Bearer token authenticated requests to the configured Bitbucket Server endpoint, allowing attackers able to intercept network traffic to capture the token.
CVE-2026-54323 Medium · 5.9 CWE-295 Jun 23, 2026
Daytona: Git credential leak via git clone with TLS verification disabled
Daytona is a secure and elastic infrastructure runtime for AI-generated code execution and agent workflows. Prior to 0.185.0, the daemon's git clone implementation disabled TLS certificate verification. When a clone request carried Git credentials, the daemon sent the HTTP Basic Authorization header to the remote over a connection whose certificate was never validated, on both the go-git and native git CLI code paths. An attacker able to intercept clone traffic could present any TLS certificate, capture the Git credentials supplied for the clone, and serve tampered repository content into the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.185.0.
CVE-2026-54100 High · 8.3 CWE-295 Jun 22, 2026
Windows-machine-config-operator: windows-machine-config-operator: ssh host key not verified enables credential theft
A flaw was found in the Windows Machine Config Operator (WMCO) for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. WMCO establishes SSH connections to Windows worker nodes without verifying the remote server host key. An adjacent-network attacker who can intercept or redirect WMCO's SSH session can capture WICD and kubelet bootstrap credentials transferred during node configuration, enabling compromise of Windows node identities in the cluster.
CVE-2025-2669 Medium · 6.5 CWE-295 Jun 22, 2026
Multiple vulnerabilities affect IBM Db2® on Cloud Pak for Data, and Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data.
IBM Db2 on Cloud Pak for Data and Db2 Warehouse on Cloud Pak for Data versions 4.8, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 could allow a privileged user to perform operations and obtain sensitive information outside of their authority due to improper token validation.
CVE-2026-9697 High · 7.4 CWE-295 Jun 17, 2026
undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent
Impact: undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings. Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange. Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added. Patches: Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path. If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.
CVE-2024-47477 Medium · 6.5 CWE-295 Jun 17, 2026
Improper Certificate Validation in Dell Powerflex Manager
Dell PowerFlex Manager, versions prior to 4.5.1.1, contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to man-in-the-middle attack in tandem with DNS cache poisoning.
CVE-2025-71261 High · 8.6 CWE-295 Jun 16, 2026
Harvester's SUSE Virtualization Registration Client Vulnerable to MITM and DOS
An attacker with network-level access between the SUSE Virtualization and Rancher Manager in SUSE Harvester before 1.8.0 could interfere with the TLS handshake and abuse it to bypass TLS as a security control.
CVE-2026-9259 Critical · 9.8 CWE-295 Jun 15, 2026
Canon EOS Network Setting Tool Improper Server Certificate Validation
Improper validation of server certificates in Canon EOS Network Setting Tool Version 1.5.0 or earlier
CVE-2026-9258 Critical · 9.8 CWE-295 Jun 15, 2026
Improper Certificate Validation in Canon Inc. Eos Network Setting Tool
Improper validation of SSH host keys in Canon EOS Network Setting Tool Version 1.5.0 or earlier
CVE-2026-45389 High · 7.4 CWE-295 Jun 15, 2026
In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the…
In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the client (when doing client authentication), which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for client authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).
CVE-2026-45388 Critical · 9.1 CWE-295 Jun 15, 2026
In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the client implementation does insufficient checks of the…
In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the client implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the server, which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for server authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).