Home / CVEs
CVE Database
Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.
CVE-2026-76234
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 19, 2026
libcrux before 0.0.6 Cryptographic Implementation Bug Fixes
libcrux-ecdh and libcrux-ed25519 before 0.0.6, and libcrux-psq before 0.0.7, contain cryptographic implementation bugs. libcrux-ecdh did not properly check length and clamping during X25519 secret validation (and had a broken clamping check for imported X25519 secret keys); libcrux-ed25519 performed a duplicated clamping step during key generation; and libcrux-psq panicked instead of propagating an AEADError. These were fixed in the respective patched releases.
CVE-2026-50720
Medium · 6.4
CWE-347 Aug 19, 2026
The Ingenic T31 SoC boot ROM flash-boot verification path compares only a single 32-bit…
The Ingenic T31 SoC boot ROM flash-boot verification path compares only a single 32-bit word of the RSA signature output against a single 32-bit word of the SHA-256 payload digest, rather than compare the full data. This allows an attacker with physical write access to boot media to forge modified SPL (Secondary Program Loader) images that pass secure boot verification without possession of the OEM signing key. Each forgery attempt succeeds with approximately 2/3 probability. This has been validated via reverse engineering, software emulation against vendor-signed images, and end-to-end hardware acceptance of a forged firmware image on a Wyze Video Doorbell v2 (T31X).
CVE-2026-72889
Critical · 9.8
CWE-347 Aug 19, 2026
Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify
Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl allow the sender to choose the signature algorithm in verify.
verify resolves the signature method class from the signature_method parameter of the incoming message. signature_method is required on every request, so the algorithm used to check a signature is chosen by whoever sent it, and nothing lets the verifying party pin the method instead. When a message names HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256, the key is derived from consumer_secret and token_secret rather than from the key the provider deployed.
A provider deployed on RSA-SHA1 holds only the consumer public key, and RFC 5849 does not use consumer_secret for that method, so the required parameter is filled with a placeholder. A client that names HMAC-SHA1 instead has its signature checked against that placeholder, so a guessable one is enough to forge requests for any consumer key and token.
CVE-2026-58085
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 19, 2026
Missing MAC validation in wg(4) packet decryption
After dispatching a decrypt operation to OCF and receiving the result, the wg(4) driver failed to check whether the MAC verification step succeeded. The driver thus silently accepted packets with an invalid Poly1305 authentication tag.
A remote attacker who can send UDP packets to a WireGuard endpoint, and who can guess the bounds of the receiver's replay window, can inject forged or modified transport data packets into the tunnel.
A remote attacker who can intercept WireGuard packets bound for a FreeBSD host can modify the ciphertext and authenticated data without detection by the receiver.
CVE-2026-55165
Medium · 4.8
CWE-347 Aug 18, 2026
Lemur : JWT verifier trusts attacker-supplied alg from token header — defense-in-depth gap; chain-dependent ATO with secret disclosure
Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. Prior to 1.9.2, the JWT verifier in lemur/auth/service.py:130-137 used fetch_token_header to read header_data["alg"] from an unverified token and passed that attacker-controlled value to decode_with_multiple_secrets. PyJWT 2.x rejects alg=none with the configured key, so the flaw is a defense-in-depth gap rather than a direct authentication bypass in the shipped configuration. The unpinned algorithm can become exploitable after an asymmetric-signing migration through algorithm confusion, and it weakens algorithm-based anomaly detection because the token chooses the recorded value. A separate disclosure of LEMUR_TOKEN_SECRET would also permit forged HS256 tokens, although that disclosure is an independent prerequisite. The fix introduces the server-controlled LEMUR_TOKEN_ALGORITHMS allowlist and defaults it to HS256. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.2.
CVE-2025-9210
High · 8.1
CWE-347 Aug 18, 2026
Missing JSON Web Token signature validation in Otalio Ship Property Management System
Missing signature validation in JSON Web Tokens in Otalio Ship Property Management System versions before 2.22.0 allows authenticated attackers to escalate privileges via tampering with JWTs
CVE-2021-43716
Critical · 9.8
CWE-347 Aug 18, 2026
Verification Bypass vulnerability exists in EPSON 150075647YWWV110 EasyMP Network…
Verification Bypass vulnerability exists in EPSON 150075647YWWV110 EasyMP Network Updater Ver.1.20. The Epson projector can be updated by encrypted firmware through USB.
CVE-2026-74901
Critical · 9.8
CWE-347 Aug 17, 2026
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Authentication Bypass via AES-CTR Fallback
openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in pqc.py where AES-GCM decryption failures trigger fallback to unauthenticated AES-CTR mode. Attackers can modify ciphertext in transit to bypass integrity verification and perform bit-flipping attacks without detection.
CVE-2026-74876
Critical · 9.8
CWE-347 Aug 17, 2026
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Unverified Key Bundle Encryption
openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain a vulnerability in PublicKeyBundle.from_dict() that creates key bundles from untrusted data without verifying signatures. Attackers can call from_dict() followed by to_identity() without signature verification to encrypt data using attacker-controlled public keys, leaking secrets.
CVE-2026-18500
High · 8.1
CWE-347 Aug 15, 2026
@fastify/jwt vulnerable to authorization bypass via global secret overriding the per-request key
@fastify/jwt is a JSON Web Token plugin for Fastify. In versions before 10.2.2, a per-request verification key passed to request.jwtVerify({ key }) is silently overridden by the plugin's globally configured secret, because the option merge applies the global key last. Applications that use different keys for different authorization domains, for example separate user and admin keys, therefore accept a token signed with the global key on a route that explicitly requires another key. This lets an ordinary authenticated user cross a key-based trust boundary without knowing either secret. The issue is fixed in @fastify/jwt 10.2.2, where an explicit per-call key takes precedence over the global secret. Users should upgrade to 10.2.2.
CVE-2026-74244
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 14, 2026
Quay: stripe webhook accepts forged events without signature verification in quay
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
CVE-2026-19910
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 14, 2026
PAX Technology Q80 Application Installer Signature Verification Bypass Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
PAX Technology Q80 Application Installer Signature Verification Bypass Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of PAX Technology Q80. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the application installer. The issue results from the lack of proper verification of a cryptographic signature before installing an application. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-30585.
CVE-2026-47192
Low · 2.1
CWE-347 Aug 14, 2026
kas's late signature validation may allow unnoticed repository manipulations
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Starting in version 4.8 and prior to version 5.3, kas checks out and processes repositories regarding configuration includes prior to validating signatures of those repositories. This may allow to replace on original repository with one under the control of an attacker under very specific conditions. First of all, the attacker must have gained control of a repository that a kas file of the victim is referencing. Furthermore, the following conditions must be fulfilled: the victim's kas configuration must include a configuration file from the attacked repository; the repository state is referenced by tag, and no commit ID is specified (this is triggering a warning, though); the key used for validating the tag or commit signature is stored as file in a repository; no fingerprint for the key is specified; and the `_source_dir` key must not be set by the victim when calling kas (e.g. by avoiding a local `.config.yaml`). Given these conditions, the attacker could modify the included kas configuration in way that the key used to validate the tag signature of the attacker's repository could be replaced by an attacker-chosen key. No other exploit possibilities have been identified so far, but this does not rule out that those may exist. All patches have been released along with kas version 5.3. As a workaround, pin the expected signature key via its fingerprint, also when storing it as file in a repository.
CVE-2026-47191
Low · 2.1
CWE-347 Aug 14, 2026
kas checks out SHA-like git branches as valid commits
kas is a setup tool for bitbake based projects. Prior to version 5.3, when relying solely on a git commit ID (SHA-1 or SHA-256) to qualify if a checkout of a repository is equivalent to the state validated while adding its commit ID to a kas configuration, users may be tricked to check out a branch of the same name from this repository. This implies that the referenced repository has been taken over by an attacker and modified to carry such a branch. SHA-1 commits may also be replaced by creating hash collisions, so the primary impact of this issue is on SHA-256 commit IDs. Version 5.3 fixes the issue. As a workaround, avoid relying solely on the commit ID for integrity validation of a repository that might become under control of a malicious 3rd party. If available, additional validate cryptographically signed commits or tags. Alternatively, mirror the repository to a save place, validate its integrity, and use this instead of the original one.
CVE-2026-56865
High · 8.4
CWE-347 Aug 13, 2026
Fix transparency log tile verification bypass in golang.org/x/mod/sumdb/tlog
A malicious GOPROXY was previously capable of forging up to two sumdb tiles that allow for a requested module to bypass the GOSUMDB check and persist attacker-controlled module content to a local Go module cache. This attack allows for a malicious GOPROXY to serve malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. All tiles are now correctly verified against their parents. In order to determine if you have been affected: rm -r go.sum go.work.sum vendor/ && go mod tidy
CVE-2026-56864
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 13, 2026
Ignore unrelated, unauthenticated hashes in Lookup in golang.org/x/mod/sumdb
A malicious GOSUMDB was capable of serving arbitrary module content not contained within the transparency log. This attack allows for a coordinating GOPROXY and GOSUMDB to serve a client malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. In order to determine if you have been affected: rm -r go.sum go.work.sum vendor/ && go mod tidy
CVE-2026-28148
Critical · 9.8
CWE-347 Aug 13, 2026
WordPress Headless Single Sign On plugin <= 1.6 - Bypass Vulnerability vulnerability
Unauthenticated Bypass Vulnerability in Headless Single Sign On <= 1.6 versions.
CVE-2026-12263
High · 8.8
CWE-347 Aug 13, 2026
Authentication Bypass
Zohocorp ManageEngine Password Manager Pro versions before 13232 and PAM360 versions before 8551 are vulnerable to an authentication bypass vulnerability due to improper SAML validation.
CVE-2026-48791
Low · 2.0
CWE-347 Aug 12, 2026
Sigstore Java has a vulnerability with bundle verification of integratedTime
sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. Version 2.0.0 erroneously removed verification of the integrated (Rekor entry) time) against the Fulcio certificate. Version 2.1.0 re-added this verification with enhancements that adhere to the Sigstore verification spec. The old sigstore-conformance test for this check was built incorrectly. This vulnerability impacts only users verifying bundles with `dev.sigstore:sigstore-java:2.0.0`. Older versions are not affected; it is fixed in `dev.sigstore:sigstore-java:2.1.0` A malicious actor may exploit this if they were able to access a users system and exfiltrate the temporary private key used during signing and then reuse an old fulcio certificate later without requiring direct access to the user's credentials. Users may protect themselves by re-verifying their artifacts using the newest sigstore-java or another current sigstore client. Transparency logs may also be audited for unauthorized signatures for a suspected reused identity.
CVE-2026-68759
High · 7.2
CWE-347 Aug 12, 2026
Integration credential holders may impersonate users in JFrog Access
A holder of a valid integration credential may impersonate other users under specific conditions.
CVE-2026-68757
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 12, 2026
Potential improper SAML signature verification in JFrog Artifactory
A user with access to a valid SAML response may impersonate another user under specific conditions.
CVE-2025-59324
Critical · 9.1
CWE-347 Aug 12, 2026
CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly validate LUKS…
CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped.
CVE-2025-59327
High · 7.5
CWE-347 Aug 12, 2026
In CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4, bootxsa.efi fails to properly…
In CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4, bootxsa.efi fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped.
CVE-2026-62757
Medium · 5.9
CWE-347 Aug 11, 2026
Windows Schannel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Windows Schannel allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
CVE-2026-15556
High · 8.1
CWE-347 Aug 11, 2026
Picketlink-federation: picketlink saml 2.0 auth bypass via missing assertions
A flaw was found in Picketlink's SP signature validation; a SAML response containing zero assertion elements matching the signature check can allow an attacker to forge a SAML response and auth as any principal with any roles on the protected application.