CVE Database

FrontAccounting through 2.4.20 generates a CSRF token in end_form() in includes/ui/ui_controls.inc and embeds it as the _token hidden field in every form it renders, but only admin/users.php and admin/change_current_user_password.php call check_csrf_token() to validate it. No financial transaction handler validates the token, including gl/gl_journal.php, gl/gl_bank.php, purchasing/supplier_invoice.php, sales/customer_invoice.php, sales/customer_payments.php and admin/company_preferences.php, so those endpoints act on POST data with no origin check. An attacker who gets an authenticated user to load a page under attacker control can auto-submit a cross-origin form to any of them and have the forged journal entry, invoice, customer payment, bank transaction or company configuration change recorded under the victim's session.

The UpdraftPlus: WP Backup & Migration Plugin WordPress plugin before 1.26.7 does not have CSRF checks in one of its backup management actions, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin restore an existing backup, reverting the site's database and files to an earlier state, via a crafted link.

Nagios Core before 4.5.13 and Nagios XI before 2026R1.5 contains a CSRF vulnerability in cmd.cgi. When no Cookie header is present, the double-submit cookie protection can be bypassed by supplying matching NagFormId and nagFormId values in the POST body, allowing a cross-site request to execute Nagios commands as a currently authenticated user.

Nagios Core before 4.5.12 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in cmd.cgi where the CSRF protection mechanism passes validation when the NagFormId cookie is absent. Attackers can craft a malicious cross-site POST request to execute arbitrary Nagios commands as a currently authenticated user without their knowledge or consent.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Hash Form <= 1.4.0 versions.

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Fluent Support Pro <= 2.3.1 versions.

WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in objects/videoEditLight.php that lacks request authenticity checks and accepts GET requests. Attackers can store an img tag in a video description that transfers video ownership to an attacker-controlled account when an administrator views the video page.

AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in channelToGallery.json.php that allows attackers to modify site-wide Gallery configuration by performing unauthorized writes to plugin data. Attackers can craft a cross-site GET request carrying an administrator's session cookie to promote arbitrary channels to the front page or delete curated sections without token validation.

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unauthenticated file upload with missing directory protection in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - The file upload endpoint accepted POST requests from unauthenticated visitors with no CSRF token. Compounding this, the installer manifest omitted the upload and invoices directories, causing fresh installs to deploy those directories without .htaccess/web.config protection, making uploaded files directly web-accessible.

Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Download quota manipulation in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An authenticated user with a valid order token could increment the download limit counter on a download record belonging to a different order. The endpoint also lacked a CSRF token.

Joomla Extension - yootheme.com - Missing CSRF tokens on front-end state changes in Zoo < 4.1.66

The LitExtension WordPress plugin through 1.2.5 does not verify a nonce before an administrative action that overwrites the store-migration connector's authentication token, allowing attackers to take over the connector token by tricking a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link (CSRF).

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Dynamic Input Field Generator Using HTML, CSS, and PHP 1.0. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Frappe is a full-stack web application framework. In version 16.31.0 and earlier, the whitelisted frappe.model.workflow.bulk_workflow_approval endpoint in frappe/model/workflow.py accepts safe HTTP methods for state-changing workflow approvals because the endpoint is not restricted to POST. An attacker can induce an authenticated victim browser to submit an approval action with the victim privileges. No released fixed version is available as of this review.

ATutor is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in profile update functionality. An attacker can craft a malicious website which, when visited by an authenticated victim, submits a forged request to the system. Due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation, the forged request is processed successfully, allowing an attacker to modify profile fields of an existing user. Product is no longer actively supported and the vulnerabilities have not been fixed. Only version 2.2.4 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested but might also be vulnerable.

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store a Dashboard Studio workflow action containing attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL). When another authenticated user selects the action from Event Actions and selects Continue, Splunk Enterprise runs the injected SPL using the permissions of that user. The injected SPL could access or modify data available to that user. The vulnerability is possible because Dashboard Studio does not sufficiently validate workflow-action URLs before submitting requests. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The user who holds the "power" Splunk role should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.