Home / CVEs
CVE Database
Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.
CVE-2026-108909
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 12, 2026
Netcore NR268 CGI Endpoint cross-site request forgery
A security flaw has been discovered in Netcore NR268 1.7.121109. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component CGI Endpoint. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-78358
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 12, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Administrative Actions
Several administrative actions do not sufficiently validate whether a request was intentionally initiated by the authenticated user. In particular, the DBUpdateLogCleanUp action can be triggered through a GET request without validating a ChallengeToken. An unauthenticated remote attacker can therefore cause the browser of an authenticated administrator to execute the cleanup action by embedding a crafted request in a malicious web page. Successful exploitation can delete existing DBUpdate log entries. This may reduce the availability of diagnostic and historical information used for troubleshooting and auditing. The impact is limited to DBUpdate log entries that exist at the time the forged request is processed.
Additional administrative endpoints were identified that do not validate a ChallengeToken. Some of these endpoints can trigger administrative actions such as deploying or synchronizing already existing configuration. They do not allow an attacker to introduce arbitrary new configuration through the CSRF request itself.
Export and read-only endpoints were also identified without ChallengeToken validation. While these endpoints may be triggered through a forged cross-site request, the response content remains subject to the browser's same-origin restrictions and is not automatically exposed to the attacker. Therefore, no direct confidentiality impact has been demonstrated for these endpoints.
This issue affects OTRS:
* 7.0.X
* 8.0.X
* 2023.X
* 2024.X
* 2025.X
* 2026.X before 2026.7.X
Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected
CVE-2026-48211
Medium · 5.4
CWE-352 Oct 12, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Import/Export Admin console
An authenticated administrator can be induced to delete administrative Import/Export templates through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. The OTRS AdminImportExport::TemplateDelete action does not validate the request's ChallengeToken, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to craft a malicious request that is executed with the privileges of an active administrator session.
This issue affects OTRS:
* 7.0.X
* 8.0.X
* 2023.X
* 2024.X
* 2025.X
* 2026.X before 2026.7.X
Please note that ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.x and before are vulnerable. Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected
CVE-2026-84166
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 12, 2026
The Hotel Booking WordPress plugin through 3.8 does not implement CSRF protection on its...
The Hotel Booking WordPress plugin through 3.8 does not implement CSRF protection on its administrative booking order management, allowing attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into creating, deleting, or modifying arbitrary booking order records via a forged request.
CVE-2026-108800
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 12, 2026
yangzongzhuan RuoYi cross-site request forgery
A vulnerability was identified in yangzongzhuan RuoYi 4.8.3. The affected element is an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-108738
Medium · 4.2
CWE-352 Oct 11, 2026
Traccar 5.7 through 6.16.0 Login CSRF via OpenID Connect Callback
Traccar 5.7 through 6.16.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to log victims into attacker-controlled accounts because the OpenID Connect callback never validates the OAuth state parameter. Attackers can induce a victim's browser to load /api/session/openid/callback with their own authorization code, causing data the victim enters, such as registered devices, to land in the attacker's account.
CVE-2026-108553
High · 7.5
CWE-352 Oct 10, 2026
OpenRefine through 3.10.1 CSRF to RCE via get-rows Command
OpenRefine through 3.10.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get-rows command that allows remote attackers to execute Jython facet expressions. Attackers can lure a user to a malicious page issuing a cross-origin GET with a crafted engine parameter, executing operating system commands as the OpenRefine user.
CVE-2026-107848
Low · 3.5
CWE-352 Oct 9, 2026
Contao: Cross-site request forgery in custom backend actions
Contao is an Open Source CMS. From version 4.0.0 until 5.3.50 and 5.7.12, RequestTokenListener validates REQUEST_TOKEN only for POST requests, while the declarative GET guard runs only when an act parameter is present. Backend actions dispatched through the key parameter can therefore execute without a CSRF token when an authenticated backend user loads an attacker-controlled URL. Reachable actions remain limited to modules available to that user, and the advisory demonstrates destructive or state-changing actions rather than privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in versions 5.3.50 and 5.7.12.
CVE-2026-107809
High · 8.8
CWE-352 Oct 9, 2026
Nginx-UI AuthRequired token cookie fallback enables CSRF against management APIs
Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. From 2.0.0 until 2.5.0, AuthRequired accepts a browser-managed token cookie as an API credential after the front end stores the JWT in that cookie. Because management endpoints do not universally require a CSRF token or perform Origin or Referer validation, a remote attacker can induce a logged-in administrator's browser to submit authenticated cross-site state-changing requests, including POST /api/configs. The attack requires an administrator account without OTP/Passkey or a target endpoint that does not require secure-session proof. The attacker cannot read the cross-origin response but can modify Nginx configuration, trigger reloads, or invoke other management operations reachable with the victim's session. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.0.
CVE-2026-62026
High · 7.1
CWE-352 Oct 9, 2026
WordPress Dashboard Notes plugin <= 1.0.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MIGHTYminnow Dashboard Notes dashboard-notes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Dashboard Notes: from n/a through 1.0.3.
CVE-2026-85348
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 9, 2026
GDPR Data Request Form 1.5 - 1.7.1 - DPO Email Update via CSRF
The GDPR Data Request Form WordPress plugin through 1.7.1 does not have CSRF protection when updating one of its settings, allowing attackers to change that setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-96671
High · 8.8
CWE-352 Oct 9, 2026
WordPress Featured Image from URL plugin <= 6.0.7 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fifu.app Featured Image from URL featured-image-from-url allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Featured Image from URL: from n/a through 6.0.7.
CVE-2026-107831
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
Jivejdon through 5.0 CSRF via GET-based Account and Thread Actions
Jivejdon through 5.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform state-changing actions by abusing GET endpoints lacking anti-CSRF tokens. Attackers can lure authenticated users to crafted links targeting /account/protected/delAll, /account/protected/sub/delSub, or /message/updateAction to delete private messages and subscriptions or rename threads.
CVE-2026-78388
High · 8.8
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
Security vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access
IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
CVE-2026-107337
High · 7.1
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Malcolm
The Malcolm kiosk Flask application exposes a POST /script_call/<script> endpoint with zero authentication and wildcard CORS (CORS(app)). An attacker can force the operator's browser to execute arbitrary management commands via CSRF, including control.py --wipe which permanently deletes all captured network traffic and forensic logs, or control.py --stop which blinds the security monitoring.
CVE-2026-107295
High · 7.6
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
`pydantic-ai-slim` web UI `/api/chat` accepts browser-simple cross-origin requests that can trigger agent tool execution
Pydantic AI is a Python agent framework for building applications and workflows with Generative AI. From 1.34.0 until 1.107.4 and 2.28.0, the Agent.to_web() and clai web development chat endpoint has missing request content-type validation. A website visited by a developer can submit a browser-compatible request to a loopback-hosted chat server, causing the served agent to run and execute tools with the privileges and credentials of the local process; client-relayed approval decisions also leave requires_approval=True tools exposed. Binding to localhost does not prevent a browser page from reaching the loopback address. This issue is fixed in versions 1.107.4 and 2.28.0.
CVE-2026-66479
High · 7.1
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
WordPress WPComplete plugin <= 2.9.5.6 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liquid Web / StellarWP WPComplete wpcomplete allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WPComplete: from n/a through 2.9.5.6.
CVE-2026-62142
High · 8.8
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
WordPress WP 2FA plugin <= 4.1.0 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Melapress WP 2FA wp-2fa allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP 2FA: from n/a through 4.1.0.
CVE-2026-106611
High · 7.1
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
WordPress Forminator plugin <= 1.57.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Forminator forminator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Forminator: from n/a through 1.57.3.
CVE-2026-102784
High · 8.7
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
Joomla Extension - balbooa.com - CSRF in language installation feature Gridbox < 2.20.4.0
Joomla Extension - balbooa.com - CSRF in language installation feature Gridbox < 2.20.4.0 - PagesController uses a trait that validates the Joomla session token only when the HTTP method is POST. addLanguage does not require POST inside the action and reads url and zip through the generic request input. A GET request can therefore reach the action without the trait checking a token. The action still requires core.tools , but that is the victim’s permission check; it does not prove that the privileged user intended the request.
CVE-2026-105260
Medium · 4.3
CWE-352 Oct 8, 2026
Database Addon For WPForms < 1.1.1 - Arbitrary Form Entry Deletion via CSRF
The Database Addon For WPForms ( wpforms entries ) WordPress plugin before 1.1.1 does not verify the CSRF nonce when the field is omitted and performs no capability check of its own, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary stored form entries by tricking a logged-in administrator into loading a crafted page.
CVE-2025-70522
High · 8.8
CWE-352 Oct 7, 2026
The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any…
The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any cross-origin resource protection for any state-changing request performed against the applications. Due to the lack of protection, cross-origin boundary can be completely bypassed, allowing for Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks against any endpoint.
CVE-2025-70517
High · 8.8
CWE-352 Oct 7, 2026
The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any…
The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any cross-origin resource protection for any state-changing request performed against the applications. Due to the lack of protection, cross-origin boundary can be completely bypassed, allowing for Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks against any endpoint.
CVE-2026-45161
Medium · 5.4
CWE-352 Oct 7, 2026
wger: trainer_login accepts GET - CSRF bypass enables forced session rebinding
wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Prior to version 2.6, the `trainer_login` view in wger accepts GET requests and executes `django_login()` without any CSRF protection, because Django's `CsrfViewMiddleware` only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single `<img>` tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer's session to an arbitrary user account. Version 2.6 fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-106216
Medium · 5.4
CWE-352 Oct 6, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Google Chrome
Cross-site request forgery in ReadingList in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)