CVE Intelligence
Home / CVEs

CVE Database

Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.

Severity
Clear

1.470 result(s)

Export this search: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-7616 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
Zawgyi Embed <= 2.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via 'zawgyi_forceCSS' Parameter
The Zawgyi Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the zawgyi_adminpage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's zawgyi_forceCSS setting by submitting a forged POST request to options-general.php?page=zawgyi_embed via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-7562 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
WP-Redirection <= 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The WP-Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.3. This is due to the absence of a nonce field in the admin settings form and the lack of any nonce verification (via check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce()) in the displayWPRedirectionManagementPage() function before processing POST requests that add, edit, or delete URL redirection rules. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link, causing the attacker to create, modify, or delete redirection records in the plugin's database table without the administrator's consent.
CVE-2026-7561 Medium · 6.1 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
Tm – WordPress Redirection <= 1.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting
The Tm – WordPress Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-6932 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
Woo Commerce Minimum Weight <= 3.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via Settings Update Form
The Woo Commerce Minimum Weight plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.0.1. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings update handler in edit-weight.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the minimum order weight setting by tricking a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting an attacker-controlled page containing a forged POST request.
CVE-2026-6710 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
Skysa Text Ticker App <= 1.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Modification via 'Save Settings' Form
The Skysa Text Ticker App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the SkysaApps_Admin_AppPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into making a forged request to modify the plugin's settings, including the scrolling message text and URL, via a forged cross-site request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-45430 High · 7.1 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
The Salesforce module before 1.x-1.0.1 for Backdrop CMS does not properly use a random state...
The Salesforce module before 1.x-1.0.1 for Backdrop CMS does not properly use a random state parameter to protect the authorization flow against CSRF attacks.
CVE-2026-0502 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 May 12, 2026
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform
Due to insufficient CSRF protection in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform ,an authenticated user could be tricked by an attacker to send unintended requests to the web server. This has low impact on integrity and availability of the application. There is no impact on confidentiality of the data.
CVE-2026-44695 Medium · 6.5 CWE-352 May 11, 2026
Outline: Slack OAuth state can link a victim Outline account to an attacker Slack identity
Outline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Prior to 1.7.1, the Slack integration callback for GET /auth/slack.post accepts an unsigned, session-independent OAuth state value. A third party who can obtain a Slack OAuth code for the same Outline Slack client can make a logged-in Outline user complete the callback and link that user's Outline account to the attacker's Slack team_id and user_id. The linked Slack identity can then use the Slack /outline search command as the victim Outline user. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.1.
CVE-2026-43877 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 May 11, 2026
WWBN AVideo: CSRF in userSavePhoto.php Allows Cross-Origin Overwrite of Any Logged-in User's Profile Photo with Arbitrary Bytes
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 29.0, objects/userSavePhoto.php is a legacy profile-photo endpoint that accepts a base64 POST parameter and writes the decoded bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<users_id>.png. Its only access control is User::isLogged(). It does not end in .json.php, so it is excluded from the project's global autoCSRFGuard (which is suffix-scoped in objects/include_config.php). There is no CSRF token, no Origin/Referer check, and no MIME validation of the decoded bytes. Because AVideo's default cookie policy is SameSite=None; Secure on HTTPS (objects/functionsPHP.php:227), an attacker who lures a logged-in user to a malicious page can overwrite that user's profile photo with arbitrary bytes and also triggers a site-wide clearCache(true) on every forged request. Commit 9c38468041505e637101c5943c5370c68f48e3ac contains an updated fix.
CVE-2026-38566 High · 8.1 CWE-352 May 11, 2026
HireFlow v1.2 does not implement CSRF token validation on any state-changing POST…
HireFlow v1.2 does not implement CSRF token validation on any state-changing POST endpoint. All forms (password change at /profile, candidate deletion at /candidates/delete/<id>, feedback submission at /feedback/add/<id>, interview scheduling at /interviews/add) are vulnerable to CSRF. An attacker who can trick an authenticated user into visiting a malicious page can silently change the victim's password, delete records, or inject arbitrary data on their behalf. The SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE attribute is also not configured, removing the browser-level CSRF defense.
CVE-2022-50955 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 10, 2026
WordPress Plugin Curtain 1.0.2 Cross-site Request Forgery
WordPress Plugin Curtain 1.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to activate or deactivate site maintenance mode by crafting malicious requests. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting forged requests to the options-general.php page with curtain parameters to toggle maintenance mode without valid nonce validation.
CVE-2021-47953 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 10, 2026
OpenCart 3.0.3.7 Cross-Site Request Forgery via account/password
OpenCart 3.0.3.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change user passwords by sending crafted requests to the account/password endpoint. Attackers can trick authenticated users into submitting hidden forms with new password values in the 'password' and 'confirm' parameters to hijack accounts.
CVE-2021-47946 Medium · 5.3 CWE-352 May 10, 2026
OpenCart 3.0.3.6 Account Takeover via Cross Site Request Forgery
OpenCart 3.0.3.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the /account/edit endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to modify victim account details by tricking users into visiting malicious pages. Attackers can craft CSRF payloads that change victim email addresses and account information, then use password reset functionality to gain unauthorized access to compromised accounts.
CVE-2026-8194 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 9, 2026
osTicket Dispatcher class.dispatcher.php cross-site request forgery
A security vulnerability has been detected in osTicket up to 1.18.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method leads to cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet.
CVE-2026-42286 High · 8.4 CWE-352 May 8, 2026
Emlog: Cross-Site Request Forgery in Admin Functions
Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.11, missing CSRF protection in critical admin functions allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unauthorized actions like system registration, plugin management, and configuration changes. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.11.
CVE-2026-42190 Medium · 5.3 CWE-352 May 8, 2026
RedwoodSDK: Same-site CSRF in in server actions
RedwoodSDK is a server-first React framework. From version 1.0.0-beta.50 to before version 1.2.3, server actions in rwsdk apply HTTP method enforcement but no origin validation. A request originating from a different origin that the browser treats as same-site can invoke a server action with the victim's session cookie attached. This issue has been patched in version 1.2.3.
CVE-2026-5791 Medium · 6.5 CWE-352 May 7, 2026
CSRF in DivvyDrive Information Technologies' DivvyDrive
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DivvyDrive Information Technologies Inc. DivvyDrive allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects DivvyDrive: from 4.8.2.9 before 4.8.3.2.
CVE-2026-27415 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 7, 2026
WordPress BEAR plugin <= 1.1.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginUs.Net BEAR allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects BEAR: from n/a through 1.1.5.
CVE-2025-68604 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 May 7, 2026
WordPress WPGraphQL plugin <= 2.5.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 2.5.3.
CVE-2026-41663 Low · 3.5 CWE-352 May 7, 2026
Admidio: CSRF on Admin Preferences Triggers Unauthorized Backup, .htaccess Write, and Email Send
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.9.
CVE-2026-40326 High · 7.1 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Masa CMS CSRF in site bundle creation allows unauthorized site data export
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the createBundle method in `csettings.cfc` does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for site bundle creation requests. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage or link that, when visited by a logged-in administrator, triggers the silent creation of a comprehensive site bundle. This bundle is saved to a predictable, publicly accessible web directory. An unauthenticated attacker can then retrieve the bundle and obtain site content, user account data, password hashes, form submissions, email lists, plugins, and configuration data. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, remove unexpected bundle files from public directories, restrict access to the affected endpoint, and limit exposure of administrative sessions.
CVE-2026-40325 High · 8.7 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Masa CMS CSRF in content restoration allows unauthorized restoration of deleted content
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the `cTrash.restore` function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for content restoration requests. An attacker can trick a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that restores deleted items from the trash and places them at an attacker-controlled location in the site structure through the parentid parameter. This can restore previously deleted malicious or outdated content, expose sensitive documents by moving them into publicly accessible locations, and disrupt site structure or content integrity. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and regularly empty the trash to reduce the amount of content available for unauthorized restoration.
CVE-2026-40309 High · 7.2 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Masa CMS CSRF in trash management allows unauthorized permanent deletion of deleted content
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cTrash.empty function does not validate anti-CSRF tokens for trash management requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that empties the trash and permanently deletes all deleted content. This can cause irreversible data loss and disrupt recovery of content intended for restoration. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, and maintain current database backups to recover from unauthorized deletion.
CVE-2026-40174 High · 7.1 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Masa CMS CSRF in user address management allows unauthorized address changes
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cUsers.updateAddress function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for user address management operations. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that adds, modifies, or deletes user address records, including email addresses and phone numbers. This can be used to alter contact information, redirect organizational communications, and corrupt address data in the user directory. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, or deploy filtering rules to block forged requests to the affected endpoint
CVE-2026-8022 Low · 3.1 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote...
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)