CVE Intelligence
Home / CVEs

CVE Database

Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.

Severity
Clear

1.472 result(s)

Export this search: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-40174 High · 7.1 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Masa CMS CSRF in user address management allows unauthorized address changes
Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cUsers.updateAddress function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for user address management operations. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that adds, modifies, or deletes user address records, including email addresses and phone numbers. This can be used to alter contact information, redirect organizational communications, and corrupt address data in the user directory. This issue has been fixed in versions 7.2.10, 7.3.15, 7.4.10, and 7.5.3. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative backend, use browser isolation for administrative sessions, or deploy filtering rules to block forged requests to the affected endpoint
CVE-2026-8022 Low · 3.1 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote...
Inappropriate implementation in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to leak cross-origin data via a crafted MHTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2025-31957 Medium · 5.7 CWE-352 May 6, 2026
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
HHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data.
CVE-2026-6702 Medium · 6.1 CWE-352 May 5, 2026
Publish 2 Ping.fm <= 1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'wpPingPingKey' Parameter
The Publish 2 Ping.fm plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the '/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=admin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-6701 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 5, 2026
addfreespace <= 0.1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Settings Page
The addfreespace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-6700 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 5, 2026
DX Sources <= 2.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update
The DX Sources plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page_build function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged request that modifies the plugin's configuration options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-42091 Medium · 6.5 CWE-352 May 4, 2026
goshs has Cross-Origin Arbitrary File Write via Missing CSRF on PUT and Wildcard CORS
goshs is a SimpleHTTPServer written in Go. Prior to version 2.0.2, the PUT upload handler (httpserver/updown.go) lacks the CSRF token validation that was added to the POST upload handler during the CVE-2026-40883 fix. Combined with the unconditional Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on the OPTIONS preflight handler (httpserver/server.go), any website can write arbitrary files to a goshs instance through the victim's browser — bypassing network isolation (e.g. localhost, internal network). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.2.
CVE-2026-3772 High · 8.8 CWE-352 May 1, 2026
WP Editor <= 1.2.9.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Remote Code Execution via Plugin and Theme File Editor
The WP Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.9.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the 'add_plugins_page' and 'add_themes_page' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite arbitrary plugin and theme PHP files with attacker-controlled code via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.
CVE-2026-3140 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 May 1, 2026
Ultimate Dashboard <= 3.8.14 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Module Activation/Deactivation
The Ultimate Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.14. This is due to a flawed nonce validation conditional in the 'handle_module_actions' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle plugin modules on or off via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-36960 High · 8.8 CWE-352 Apr 30, 2026
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface…
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the U-SPEED N300 Rounter V1.0.0. The device does not implement CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.
CVE-2026-36956 High · 8.8 CWE-352 Apr 30, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Dbitnet Dbit N300 T1 Pro Firmware
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the Dbit N300 T1 Pro wireless router V1.0.0. The router fails to implement proper CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or strict Origin/Referer validation for administrative API endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that sends forged HTTP requests to configuration endpoints such as /api/setWlan. If an authenticated administrator visits the malicious webpage, the victim's browser automatically includes the valid session cookie in the request, allowing the router to process the request as a legitimate administrative action.
CVE-2018-25310 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Apr 29, 2026
VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 2.10 - Authenticated Remote Code Execution
VideoFlow Digital Video Protection DVP 2.10 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting a cross-site request forgery flaw in the web management interface. Attackers with valid credentials can leverage the CSRF vulnerability to inject and execute system commands through the Tools > System > Shell interface, gaining root-level access to the device.
CVE-2018-25298 Medium · 5.3 CWE-352 Apr 29, 2026
Merge PACS 7.0 Cross-Site Request Forgery via merge-viewer
Merge PACS 7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious HTML forms targeting the merge-viewer endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests to /servlet/actions/merge-viewer/summary with login credentials to hijack user sessions and gain unauthorized access to the PACS system.
CVE-2026-42645 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Apr 29, 2026
WordPress Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager plugin <= 1.11.0 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager barcode-scanner-lite-pos-to-manage-products-inventory-and-orders allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Barcode Scanner with Inventory & Order Manager: from n/a through <= 1.11.0.
CVE-2026-38934 High · 8.8 CWE-352 Apr 27, 2026
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in diskoverdata diskover-community v.2.3.5. and…
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in diskoverdata diskover-community v.2.3.5. and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges and obtain sensitive information via the public/settings_process.php
CVE-2026-7108 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Apr 27, 2026
code-projects Invoice System in Laravel cross-site request forgery
A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Invoice System in Laravel 1.0. This affects an unknown function. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
CVE-2026-41425 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 Apr 24, 2026
Authlib: Cross-site request forging when using cache
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to 1.6.11, there is no CSRF protection on the cache feature in authlib.integrations.starlette_client.OAuth. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.11.
CVE-2026-3565 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Apr 24, 2026
Taqnix <= 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Account Deletion via 'taqnix_delete_my_account' AJAX Action
The Taqnix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the taqnix_delete_my_account() function, where the check_ajax_referer() call is explicitly commented out on line 883. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in non-administrator user into deleting their own account via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link or visiting a malicious page.
CVE-2026-41317 High · 7.5 CWE-352 Apr 24, 2026
Frappe Press has an unsafe HTTP method / CSRF-adjacent issue on API secret generation
Press, a Frappe custom app that runs Frappe Cloud, manages infrastructure, subscription, marketplace, and software-as-a-service (SaaS).`press.api.account.create_api_secret` is prone to CSRF-like exploits. This endpoint writes to database and it is also accessible via GET method. The patch in commit 52ea2f2d1b587be0807557e96f025f47897d00fd restricts method to POST.
CVE-2026-27841 High · 8.1 CWE-352 Apr 23, 2026
SenseLive X3050 Cross-Site request forgery
A vulnerability in SenseLive X3050's web management interface allows state-changing operations to be triggered without proper Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections. Because the application does not enforce server-side validation of request origin or implement CSRF tokens, a malicious external webpage could cause a user's browser to submit unauthorized configuration requests to the device.
CVE-2026-41347 High · 7.1 CWE-352 Apr 23, 2026
OpenClaw < 2026.3.31 - Cross-Site Request Forgery via Missing Browser-Origin Validation in HTTP Operator Endpoints
OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 lacks browser-origin validation in HTTP operator endpoints when operating in trusted-proxy mode, allowing cross-site request forgery attacks. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious requests from a browser in trusted-proxy deployments to perform unauthorized actions on HTTP operator endpoints.
CVE-2026-40471 Critical · 9.6 CWE-352 Apr 23, 2026
Hackage CSRF vulnerability
hackage-server lacked Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection across its endpoints. Scripts on foreign sites could trigger requests to hackage server, possibly abusing latent credentials to upload packages or perform other administrative actions. Some unauthenticated actions could also be abused (e.g. creating new user accounts).
CVE-2026-4922 High · 8.1 CWE-352 Apr 22, 2026
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitLab
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.0 before 18.9.6, 18.10 before 18.10.4, and 18.11 before 18.11.1 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute GraphQL mutations on behalf of authenticated users due to insufficient CSRF protection.
CVE-2025-58922 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Apr 22, 2026
WordPress Avada theme < 7.13.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeFusion Avada allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Avada: from n/a before 7.13.2.
CVE-2026-6396 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Apr 22, 2026
Fast & Fancy Filter – 3F <= 1.2.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Modification via fff_save_settins AJAX Action
The Fast & Fancy Filter – 3F plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the saveFields() function, which handles the fff_save_settins AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin filter settings, update arbitrary options, or create new filter posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.