CVE Database

CVE-2026-3193 Low · 3.1 CWE-352 Feb 25, 2026

Chia Blockchain send_transaction cross-site request forgery

A vulnerability was detected in Chia Blockchain 2.1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /send_transaction. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was informed early via email. A separate report via bugbounty was rejected with the reason "This is by design. The user is responsible for host security".

CVE-2026-2410 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 25, 2026

Disable Admin Notices – Hide Dashboard Notifications <= 1.4.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update

The Disable Admin Notices – Hide Dashboard Notifications plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the `showPageContent()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary URLs to the blocked redirects list via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVE-2026-27632 Low · 3.1 CWE-352 Feb 25, 2026

Talishar Vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Talishar is a fan-made Flesh and Blood project. Prior to commit 6be3871a14c192d1fb8146cdbc76f29f27c1cf48, the Talishar application lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protections on critical state-changing endpoints, specifically within `SubmitChat.php` and other game interaction handlers. By failing to require unique, unpredictable session tokens, the application allows third-party malicious websites to forge requests on behalf of authenticated users, leading to unauthorized actions within active game sessions. The attacker would need to know both the proper gameName and playerID for the player. The player would also need to be browsing and interact with the infected website while playing a game. The vulnerability is fixed in commit 6be3871a14c192d1fb8146cdbc76f29f27c1cf48.

CVE-2026-27609 Medium · 6.5 CWE-352 Feb 25, 2026

Parse Dashboard Missing CSRF Protection on Agent Endpoint

Parse Dashboard is a standalone dashboard for managing Parse Server apps. In versions 7.3.0-alpha.42 through 9.0.0-alpha.7, the AI Agent API endpoint (`POST /apps/:appId/agent`) lacks CSRF protection. An attacker can craft a malicious page that, when visited by an authenticated dashboard user, submits requests to the agent endpoint using the victim's session. The fix in version 9.0.0-alpha.8 adds CSRF middleware to the agent endpoint and embeds a CSRF token in the dashboard page. As a workaround, remove the `agent` configuration block from your dashboard configuration. Dashboards without an `agent` config are not affected.

CVE-2026-27589 Medium · 6.5 CWE-352 Feb 24, 2026

Caddy vulnerable to cross-origin config application via local admin API /load (caddy)

Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Prior to version 2.11.1, the local caddy admin API (default listen `127.0.0.1:2019`) exposes a state-changing `POST /load` endpoint that replaces the entire running configuration. When origin enforcement is not enabled (`enforce_origin` not configured), the admin endpoint accepts cross-origin requests (e.g., from attacker-controlled web content in a victim browser) and applies an attacker-supplied JSON config. This can change the admin listener settings and alter HTTP server behavior without user intent. Version 2.11.1 contains a fix for the issue.

CVE-2026-27518 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 24, 2026

Binardat 10G08-0800GSM Network Switch CSRF

Binardat 10G08-0800GSM network switch firmware version V300SP10260209 and prior lack CSRF protections for state-changing actions in the administrative interface. An attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into performing unauthorized configuration changes.

CVE-2026-27741 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 23, 2026

Bludit <= 3.16.1 CSRF in Plugin and Theme Management Endpoints

Bludit version 3.16.1 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the /admin/uninstall-plugin/ and /admin/install-theme/ endpoints. The application does not implement anti-CSRF tokens or other request origin validation mechanisms for these administrative actions. An attacker can induce an authenticated administrator to visit a malicious page that silently submits crafted requests, resulting in unauthorized plugin uninstallation or theme installation. This may lead to loss of functionality, execution of untrusted code via malicious themes, and compromise of system integrity.

CVE-2026-23694 Medium · 5.1 CWE-352 Feb 23, 2026

Aruba HiSpeed Cache < 3.0.5 CSRF in Multiple Administrative AJAX Actions

Aruba HiSpeed Cache (aruba-hispeed-cache) WordPress plugin versions prior to 3.0.5 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting multiple administrative AJAX actions. The handlers for ahsc_reset_options, ahsc_debug_status, and ahsc_enable_purge perform authentication and capability checks but do not verify a WordPress nonce for state-changing requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in administrator to visit a malicious webpage that submits forged requests to admin-ajax.php, resulting in unauthorized resetting of plugin settings, toggling of the WordPress WP_DEBUG configuration, or modification of cache purging behavior without the administrator’s intent.

CVE-2026-27513 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 23, 2026

Tenda F3 CSRF in Web Management Interface

Shenzhen Tenda F3 Wireless Router firmware V12.01.01.55_multi contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web-based administrative interface. The interface does not implement anti-CSRF protections, allowing an attacker to induce an authenticated administrator to submit state-changing requests, which can result in unauthorized configuration changes.

CVE-2026-27146 Medium · 4.5 CWE-352 Feb 20, 2026

GetSimple CMS: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in File Upload Allows Arbitrary Uploads

GetSimple CMS is a content management system. All versions of GetSimple CMS do not implement CSRF protection on the administrative file upload endpoint. As a result, an attacker can craft a malicious web page that silently triggers a file upload request from an authenticated victim’s browser. The request is accepted without requiring a CSRF token or origin validation. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary files to the application without the victim’s knowledge or consent. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the victim must be authenticated to GetSimple CMS (e.g., admin user), and visit an attacker-controlled webpage. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

CVE-2019-25447 Low · 3.5 CWE-352 Feb 20, 2026

OrientDB 3.0.17 Cross-Site Request Forgery

OrientDB 3.0.17 GA Community Edition contains cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities that allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions by crafting malicious requests to endpoints like /database/, /command/, and /document/. Attackers can create or delete databases, modify schema classes, manage users, and create functions by sending authenticated requests without token validation, combined with reflected and stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the web interface.

CVE-2025-13671 Medium · 6.5 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

Cross Site request forgery vulnerability discovered in OpenText WSM Management Server.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText™ Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously. This issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1.

CVE-2026-26317 High · 7.1 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

OpenClaw affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF) through loopback browser mutation endpoints

OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.2.14, browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins. A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the browser control service is reachable on loopback in the victim's browser context. Starting in version 2026.2.14, mutating HTTP methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) are rejected when the request indicates a non-loopback Origin/Referer (or `Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site`). Other mitigations include enabling browser control auth (token/password) and avoid running with auth disabled.

CVE-2026-27090 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress Kenta Companion plugin <= 1.3.3 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Moose Kenta Companion kenta-companion allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Kenta Companion: from n/a through <= 1.3.3.

CVE-2026-27050 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress RealPress plugin <= 1.1.0 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress RealPress realpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RealPress: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.

CVE-2026-25422 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress Popularis Extra plugin <= 1.2.10 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themes4WP Popularis Extra popularis-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Popularis Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.10.

CVE-2026-25411 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress Revision Manager TMC plugin <= 2.8.22 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themastercut Revision Manager TMC revision-manager-tmc allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Revision Manager TMC: from n/a through <= 2.8.22.

CVE-2026-25337 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress Coachify theme <= 1.1.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpcoachify Coachify coachify allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Coachify: from n/a through <= 1.1.5.

CVE-2026-25322 Medium · 5.4 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress PublishPress Revisions plugin <= 3.7.22 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Revisions revisionary allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PublishPress Revisions: from n/a through <= 3.7.22.

CVE-2026-25319 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

WordPress Zita Elementor Site Library plugin <= 1.6.6 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpzita Zita Elementor Site Library zita-site-library allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zita Elementor Site Library: from n/a through <= 1.6.6.

CVE-2026-1455 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

Whatsiplus Scheduled Notification for Woocommerce <= 1.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to 'wsnfw_save_users_settings' AJAX Action

The Whatsiplus Scheduled Notification for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'wsnfw_save_users_settings' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVE-2025-14167 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

Remove Post Type Slug <= 1.0.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The Remove Post Type Slug plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to incorrect nonce validation logic that uses OR (||) instead of AND (&&), causing the validation to fail when the nonce field is not empty OR when verification fails, rather than when it's empty AND verification fails. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's post type slug removal settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVE-2025-13438 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

Page Title, Description & Open Graph Updater <= 1.02 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Page Title Modification

The Page Title, Description & Open Graph Updater plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.02. This is due to missing nonce validation on multiple AJAX actions including dieno_update_page_title. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update page titles and metadata via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVE-2025-13413 Medium · 4.3 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

Country Blocker for AdSense <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The Country Blocker for AdSense plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the CBFA_guardar_cbfa() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVE-2025-12821 High · 8.8 CWE-352 Feb 19, 2026

NewsBlogger <= 0.2.5.6 - 0.2.5.9 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Plugin Installation

The NewsBlogger theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 0.2.5.6 to 0.2.5.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the newsblogger_install_and_activate_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files and achieve remote code execution via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This is due to a reverted fix of CVE-2025-1305.