Home / CVEs
CVE Database
Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.
CVE-2026-5006
Medium · 6.8
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
Vault Vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Slash Injection in Templated Policy Paths
A vulnerability was identified in HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”) such that an authenticated attacker may manipulate an identity value referenced by a templated policy path to gain unintended access to Vault paths.
An attacker who can control the referenced identity value may include slash ({{/}}) characters that Vault interprets as additional path segments when rendering the policy.
This vulnerability, CVE-2026-5006, was fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.0.4 and Vault Enterprise 2.0.4, 1.21.9, 1.20.14, and 1.19.20.
CVE-2026-71507
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
Dolibarr < 24.0.0 REST API Broken Object-Level Authorization via Bank Account Routes
Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the REST API company bank account write routes that allows authenticated attackers with third-party creation rights to create, replace, or delete bank account details of any company without requiring read access to that company. Attackers can inject attacker-controlled IBANs as creditor accounts, which are then written into regenerated SEPA credit-transfer files, redirecting outgoing payments to attacker-controlled accounts.
CVE-2026-71505
High · 7.1
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
Dolibarr < 24.0.0 REST API Broken Object-Level Authorization via Third-Party Write Route
Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a broken object-level authorization vulnerability in the REST API third-party site account write routes that allows authenticated attackers with third-party creation rights to overwrite the WebPortal password of any company by bypassing per-object access checks that are only enforced on read routes. Attackers can replace the victim company's WebPortal password through the write endpoint, authenticate as that company to access its invoice data, and also obtain the victim's previous password verifier from the API response.
CVE-2026-76073
High · 8.8
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
Label Studio through 1.23.0 Cross-Organization Annotation Access via Unscoped AnnotationAPI Queryset
Label Studio does not scope the annotation detail endpoint to the requesting user's organization. AnnotationAPI in label_studio/tasks/api.py declares queryset = Annotation.objects.all() and provides no get_queryset override, so the default lookup retrieves any annotation by primary key. The view's permission_required entries name annotations.view, annotations.change and annotations.delete, and label_studio/core/permissions.py registers every permission with rules.is_authenticated, so the check is satisfied by any logged-in account and no object-level organization test runs. The sibling task endpoint does constrain its queryset with project__organization set to the requester's active organization, which is the boundary this path omits. Annotation identifiers are sequential integers, so an authenticated user of one organization can enumerate identifiers to read, modify and delete annotations belonging to other organizations on the same instance. The same unscoped queryset appears on AnnotationConvertAPI in the same file.
CVE-2026-77995
Critical · 10.0
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
Joomla Extension - miniorange.com - Arbitrary account takeover in miniOrange OAuth Client < 3.2.0, OAuth Single Sign-On – OIDC SSO < 1.2.2, Login with Keycloak OAuth Single Sign-On (SSO) < 1.2.2, Single Sign-On for Educational Institutes < 1.2.2
Joomla Extension - miniorange.com - Arbitrary account takeover in miniOrange OAuth Client < 3.2.0, OAuth Single Sign-On – OIDC SSO < 1.2.2, Login with Keycloak OAuth Single Sign-On (SSO) < 1.2.2, Single Sign-On for Educational Institutes < 1.2.2 - The manipulation of a cookie value allows actors to login as arbitrary accounts, including admins.
CVE-2026-78365
Critical · 9.3
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
IDOR and missing authorization in Prospero Flow CRM supplier API allows cross-tenant read and modification
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the supplier API in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM 4.0.0 through 5.3.1 allows any authenticated user to read and modify another company's supplier record, and to reassign it to their own company, via a PUT request to /api/supplier/{id} setting company_id in the body.
CVE-2026-78278
Medium · 5.3
CWE-639 Aug 24, 2026
WordPress Fluent Boards Pro plugin <= 2.0.11 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability
Subscriber Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Fluent Boards Pro <= 2.0.11 versions.
CVE-2026-78203
High · 7.1
CWE-639 Aug 23, 2026
Ghostwriter before 7.1.2 Cross-Client Report Template Disclosure via Unauthorized Template Swap
Ghostwriter before 7.1.2 fails to validate template ownership in the report template swap endpoint, allowing attackers to attach client-scoped templates from other clients to their own reports. Attackers can exploit sequential template primary keys to enumerate and attach foreign templates, then generate reports to disclose template contents including letterhead, boilerplate, and methodology text.
CVE-2026-77116
Medium · 4.3
CWE-639 Aug 23, 2026
Brave Popup Builder < 0.8.6 - Subscriber+ Unpublished Popup Disclosure via Preview
Brave Popup Builder (slug: brave-popup-builder) has a broken access control issue in versions through 0.8.5. Any logged-in user - Subscriber or WooCommerce Customer is enough — can read popup content they shouldn't have access to by passing a post ID in the URL.
CVE-2026-14187
Low · 2.7
CWE-639 Aug 22, 2026
Tutor LMS < 4.0.6 - Instructor+ Cross-Instructor Private Course Disclosure via IDOR
The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 4.0.6 does not enforce per-object ownership checks on its course content type, allowing any user with the instructor role to read the content of private courses belonging to other instructors.
CVE-2026-62283
Critical · 9.9
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
Nezha Monitoring: Cross-tenant terminal/file-manager session hijack via WebSocket stream UUID without ownership check
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. Nezha versions 1.14.13 through 1.14.14 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 do not bind stream identifiers created by CreateStream in service/rpc/io_stream.go to their creating user, and `GET /ws/terminal/:id` and `GET /ws/file/:id` only check whether the supplied UUID exists. An authenticated RoleMember who obtains a live stream UUID from logs, browser history, referer data, or telemetry can attach to another user's terminal or file-manager session, read and write target-server files, and execute shell commands. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.10.
CVE-2026-67360
Medium · 6.3
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Cross-customer order replication in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Cross-customer order replication in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An authenticated user could supply another customer's order_id to copy their cart contents and address data into the attacker's session. The CSRF token was validated but ownership was not checked.
CVE-2026-67359
High · 8.7
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Order content disclosure J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Order content disclosure J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An unauthenticated visitor could supply any order_id as a query parameter to render the full checkout confirmation page for that order, including line items, prices, and totals.
CVE-2026-77780
Medium · 5.3
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
Unvalidated bank account and card foreign keys in the Prospero Flow CRM transaction save endpoint allow cross-tenant disclosure of banking identifiers
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the transaction save endpoint in Roskus
Prospero Flow CRM 4.9.1 through 5.14.0 allows a user with transaction and accounting
creation permissions to disclose another company's bank account name, bank name and card
last four digits via a bank_account_id or bank_card_id belonging to that company in POST
/transaction/save, which is persisted and rendered without any company ownership check.
CVE-2026-77776
Critical · 9.1
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
Headroom Proxy Treats the Client-Supplied x-headroom-user-id Header as an Authenticated Identity
Headroom's LLM proxy derives the memory owner from the x-headroom-user-id request header. The header is read directly at several points in headroom/proxy/handlers/openai.py, including the chat completion and websocket paths, and nothing binds the value to the caller. A client can therefore name another user's identifier and read or write that user's stored LLM memory. The fix introduces a single resolve_memory_identity seam in headroom/proxy/identity.py that honors the header only for loopback or allowlisted callers and otherwise binds the identity to the proxy-token fingerprint or the operating system user. The pip console script binds 127.0.0.1 by default, but the reference docker-compose.yml ships --host 0.0.0.0 with published ports and no required HEADROOM_PROXY_TOKEN, which the server itself warns about at startup, so a deployment following the shipped compose exposes the affected data-plane routes to the network without authentication.
CVE-2026-77759
High · 8.7
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
IDOR and missing authorization in the Prospero Flow CRM transaction API allow cross-tenant reading of financial records
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the transaction API in Roskus Prospero
Flow CRM 5.0.0 through 5.3.5 allows an authenticated user to read the transactions of other
companies on the same instance via an incremented identifier in GET /api/transaction/{id},
which is resolved without company scoping and without any permission check.
CVE-2026-77769
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
OpenPanel report.list Queries Reports by an Unverified dashboardId, Crossing Organization Boundaries
The report.list procedure in packages/trpc/src/routers/report.ts accepted a projectId and a dashboardId and returned getReportsByDashboardId(dashboardId). The enforceAccess middleware in packages/trpc/src/trpc.ts verified membership for the supplied projectId, but nothing verified that the supplied dashboardId belonged to that project, and getReportsByDashboardId in packages/db/src/services/reports.service.ts selects reports by dashboardId alone with no project scoping. An authenticated user could therefore pair a projectId from their own organization, which satisfies the middleware, with a dashboardId belonging to another organization and receive every report in that dashboard. A correctly scoped helper, listReportsCore, already existed in the same service file and resolves the dashboard through getDashboardById(dashboardId, projectId) before returning reports, but the router did not use it.
CVE-2026-77768
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
OpenPanel report.get Returns Any Report by Identifier Without Checking Project Access
The report.get procedure in packages/trpc/src/routers/report.ts accepted only a reportId and returned getReportById(reportId) directly. The enforceAccess middleware in packages/trpc/src/trpc.ts evaluates membership only when the input carries a projectId or organizationId key, so an input consisting of a reportId alone passed through unchecked, and getReportById in packages/db/src/services/reports.service.ts performs a findUnique on the report id with no project scoping. Any authenticated user could therefore read the full configuration of any saved report on the instance, including the owning projectId, event series, filters, breakdowns and formulas, by supplying its identifier. The adjacent update, delete and duplicate procedures resolve the report first and check getProjectAccess against the report's own projectId, so the omission was specific to this procedure.
CVE-2026-19085
Low · 2.7
CWE-639 Aug 21, 2026
Copy & Delete Posts < 1.5.6 - Author+ Password-Protected Post Content Disclosure
The Duplicate Post WordPress plugin before 1.5.6 does not check that a user may read the content of a post before duplicating it, allowing users with a delegated role to republish another user's password-protected post as publicly readable.
CVE-2026-69558
High · 8.6
CWE-639 Aug 20, 2026
Microsoft Partner Center Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
CVE-2026-62945
Medium · 4.3
CWE-639 Aug 20, 2026
TREK: Cross-trip reservation title disclosure via file links
TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.1.3, TREK file upload, update, and link actions accept attacker-controlled reservation_id, place_id, and assignment_id values without using findForeignLinkTarget() to verify that the referenced object belongs to the file's trip. An authenticated user with file-edit permission on any accessible trip can submit a foreign reservation identifier through POST /api/trips/:tripId/files/:id/link, POST /api/trips/:tripId/files, or PUT /api/trips/:tripId/files/:id. Subsequent reads through FILE_SELECT or getFileLinks() join the foreign reservation and return reservation_title, disclosing reservation existence and titles across private trip boundaries. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.
CVE-2026-55489
Medium · 4.9
CWE-639 Aug 20, 2026
BigBlueButton: IDOR on BBB through /api/graphql via POST parameter "presentationId" leads to Authentication Bypass
BigBlueButton is an open-source virtual classroom. Prior to 3.0.29, BigBlueButton presenters could submit a presentationId through /api/graphql that identified a presentation belonging to another meeting. akka-bbb-apps/src/main/scala/org/bigbluebutton/core/apps/presentationpod/RemovePresentationPubMsgHdlr.scala did not verify the presentation's meeting identifier before deletion, allowing a presenter who knew the identifier to delete another meeting's presentation and disrupt its availability. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.29.
CVE-2026-63003
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Aug 20, 2026
django CMS: Broken access control in page *Duplicate* allows reading the content of any page (cross-site / restriction bypass)
django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.9, page duplication lacks an object-level authorization check on the source page. In cms/admin/forms.py, DuplicatePageForm.source accepts any Page, the AddPageForm constructor does not narrow a hidden source field, AddPageForm.clean does not validate the source against the user, and AddPageForm.save calls from_source. In cms/admin/pageadmin.py, duplicate and PageAdmin.has_add_permission check only whether a staff user may add a page. A crafted source value can therefore copy every placeholder and plugin from an unauthorized page with permissions=False, stripping source view restrictions and exposing content across sites or restricted subtrees when CMS_PERMISSION is enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 5.0.9.
CVE-2026-61663
Medium · 4.3
CWE-639 Aug 20, 2026
django CMS: Missing authorization in `render_object_structure` discloses non-PageContent placeholder structure to low-privileged staff
django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.9, render_object_structure fails to authorize non-PageContent objects that use PlaceholderRelationField. An active staff user without cms.use_structure or model-level view or change permission can request the //admin/cms/placeholder/object/<content_type_id>/structure/<object_id>/ endpoint with guessed content_type_id and object_id values. The response discloses placeholder slot names, plugin trees, plugin identifiers, labels, and object existence for frontend-editable objects. The fix applies user_can_view_placeholder_source to the non-PageContent branch while keeping the structure board read-only for view-only users. This issue is fixed in versions 5.0.9.
CVE-2026-54622
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Aug 20, 2026
django CMS: Clipboard copy IDOR discloses unauthorized plugin content
django CMS is an easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise content management system powered by Django. Prior to 5.0.8, the copy_plugins endpoint in cms/admin/placeholderadmin.py authorizes only the destination clipboard. The _copy_plugin_to_clipboard and _copy_placeholder_to_clipboard paths accept source_placeholder_id and source_plugin_id values but use has_copy_plugins_permission and check_source only for the requesting user’s clipboard, without validating the source placeholder. Under CMS_PERMISSION, a staff user with the global add permission for a plugin type can copy plugins from an unauthorized page or placeholder into the user’s clipboard and read secret text, link names, and URLs. This issue is fixed in versions 5.0.8.