CVE Intelligence
Home / CVEs

CVE Database

Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.

Severity
Clear

1.912 result(s)

Export this search: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-106212 High · 8.8 CWE-863 Oct 6, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Google Chrome
Incorrect authorization in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-106199 High · 8.2 CWE-863 Oct 6, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Google Chrome
Incorrect authorization in Actor in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2026-106195 Critical · 9.1 CWE-863 Oct 6, 2026
Google Chrome Chromoting Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability (CVE-2026-106195)
Incorrect authorization in Chromoting in Google Chrome on on Mac prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2026-102322 Critical · 9.6 CWE-863 Oct 6, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Google Chrome
Incorrect Authorization in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-105864 Medium · 4.3 CWE-863 Oct 6, 2026
Payload: Cross-tenant create in @payloadcms/plugin-multi-tenant
Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. In @payloadcms/plugin-multi-tenant versions before 3.90.0 and canary versions before 4.0.0-canary.34, an authenticated user limited to one tenant can create a record in another tenant when at least one tenant-enabled collection exists. Reads and direct edits of existing documents in the target tenant are not bypassed. This issue is fixed in versions 3.90.0 and 4.0.0-canary.34.
CVE-2026-94299 Medium · 6.5 CWE-863 Oct 6, 2026
elegro Crypto Payment <= 1.0.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Order Status Change via IPN Callback
The elegro Crypto Payment WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not require a shared secret to be configured before trusting incoming payment notification requests, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge payment confirmations and change the status of arbitrary orders on any installation where that secret has been left at its default empty value.
CVE-2026-77226 High · 8.1 CWE-863 Oct 5, 2026
Camunda 7.24.0 < 7.24.15 Incorrect Authorization via SetupResource Endpoint
Camunda 7.24.0 before 7.24.15 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Admin web application's first-run setup endpoint, where SetupResource incorrectly determines setup availability by counting only direct members of the camunda-admin group rather than recognizing all configured administrators. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this logic flaw to call the setup user-create endpoint and create a new administrator account when the camunda-admin group is empty but the system is fully administered, resulting in account takeover and potential process deployment or script execution as the engine's service user.
CVE-2026-105447 Medium · 5.5 CWE-863 Oct 5, 2026
Quay: quay: global read-only superuser can access build trigger write credentials
A flaw was found in Quay. When handling build trigger requests, the application incorrectly exposes trigger configuration details containing repository write tokens to global read-only administrative users. An authenticated user with read-only privileges can exploit this flaw by querying the build trigger API to retrieve these delegate tokens. This issue allows a restricted user to bypass read-only limitations and push arbitrary container images to private repositories, leading to privilege escalation.
CVE-2026-78411 Medium · 6.5 CWE-863 Oct 5, 2026
Velociraptor Server Metadata update with Insufficient Permission Check
Velociraptor's SetClientMetadata used the wrong permission check to enforce setting metadata on the server. This allows a user with LABEL_CLIENTS permission to update the server metadata. Server metadata is often used to store site wide configuration data that should only be updated by the server admin.
CVE-2026-104978 High · 8.2 CWE-863 Oct 5, 2026
Plane: Invitation Hijack in Project Join Flow via Missing Authorization and Email-Only Acceptance
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, Plane's project invitation list endpoint is accessible to any authenticated user who knows the workspace slug and project ID, while the public project invitation join endpoint accepts an invitation based only on a submitted email address. When a pending invitation targets an email address that has not registered with Plane, an attacker can enumerate the invitation, register an account using the invited email without mailbox verification, and accept the invitation. The attacker-controlled account is then added to the target workspace and project. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0.
CVE-2026-104961 Medium · 5.4 CWE-863 Oct 5, 2026
Plane: WorkspaceOwnerPermission missing is_active check allows deactivated users to retain owner access
Plane is an open-source project management tool. Prior to 1.4.0, WorkspaceOwnerPermission does not require is_active=True when checking whether a user is a workspace owner. A deactivated user can therefore remain authorized as the workspace owner and retain owner-level access. This issue is fixed in 1.4.0.
CVE-2026-105206 Medium · 5.3 CWE-863 Oct 4, 2026
ZITADEL before 4.17.3 Cross-Organization Authentication Method Enumeration via User Service
ZITADEL 3.0.0 through 3.4.15 and 4.x before 4.17.3 contains an incorrect authorization flaw in the User Service API, which verifies user.read against the caller's organization rather than the organization owning the target user. An authenticated member holding org-scoped user.read can query GET /v2/users/{userId}/authentication_methods to learn which authentication method types users in other organizations have registered.
CVE-2026-105131 Medium · 5.4 CWE-863 Oct 3, 2026
mayswind ezBookkeeping 1.2.0 before 2.0.1 Privilege Escalation via Token Refresh Endpoint
ezBookkeeping 1.2.0 before 2.0.1 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows attackers holding an API token to obtain a full session token via /api/v1/tokens/refresh.json. Because TokenRefreshHandler never checks token type, attackers can exchange short-lived or IP-restricted API tokens for 30-day normal session tokens that bypass API token expiry and allowlists.
CVE-2026-105129 Medium · 6.5 CWE-863 Oct 3, 2026
LaraDashboard before 1.4.8 Incorrect Authorization Exposes Secrets via Settings API
LaraDashboard before 1.4.8 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users with only settings.view permission to read stored secrets through the settings API. Attackers can query GET /api/settings or /api/settings/{option_name} to retrieve plaintext AI provider API keys, mail credentials, passwords and tokens.
CVE-2026-71890 High · 8.7 CWE-863 Oct 3, 2026
MLS external commit can remove an arbitrary group member
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, validation of an MLS (RFC 9420) external commit's proposal list, org.bouncycastle.mls.protocol.Group.validateExternalCachedProposals, counted the proposals by type and bounded the removed leaf index but never established that the removed leaf had anything to do with the joiner. RFC 9420 sec. 12.2 permits at most one Remove proposal in an external commit, with which the joiner removes an old version of themselves, and requires that where one is present the LeafNode in the commit's path field meet the criteria it would have to meet in an Update for the removed leaf, in particular that its credential present identifiers acceptable for the removed participant. The ordinary proposal-list validator's self-remove rule is deliberately not applied on this path, because a resync commit legitimately removes a leaf the joiner owns, but nothing was put in its place. Any party holding the group's public GroupInfo, which is precisely what an external joiner is meant to be given, could therefore commit a Remove naming any member's LeafIndex and have every member apply it, evicting that member and taking over their slot in the ratchet tree. The credential check that should have prevented this existed only in the gRPC interop harness and so protected no other caller of the public Group.externalJoin and Group.handle API. An external commit carrying a Remove is now accepted only when the removed leaf's credential is identical to the one in the joiner's own new leaf, on both the sending and the receiving side.
CVE-2026-105090 Medium · 5.1 CWE-863 Oct 2, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Formbricks
Formbricks before 5.4.4 and 6 before 6.0.1 allows stored XSS. The survey-level Custom Head Scripts feature did not enforce the documented Manage permission boundary. A workspace member holding only readWrite permission could configure Custom Head Scripts on a survey, an operation the documentation restricts to the Manage role. Because the configured scripts execute in the authenticated browser session of any user who opens the affected survey, a lower-privileged member can run arbitrary JavaScript (stored cross-site scripting) in the session of higher-privileged users. Fixed versions require Manage access to modify survey Custom Head Scripts.
CVE-2026-104873 High · 7.6 CWE-863 Oct 2, 2026
LangGraph SDK custom auth silently ignores actions= on resource decorators
LangGraph Python SDK is used to connect to running LangGraph API servers, manage assistants, threads and stream runs from Python applications. From 0.1.45 until 0.4.4, the langgraph-sdk resource-scoped authorization decorators @auth.on.threads, @auth.on.assistants, and @auth.on.crons ignore the actions argument and register the selected handler for every action on the resource. Because that wildcard resource handler is selected before broader fallback handlers, an authenticated user may bypass fallback action, ownership, or permission checks and read, update, or delete another user's resource. Only Python deployments using actions on the affected decorators are vulnerable, and a deployment remains protected when the selected handler independently enforces all required checks for every action it receives. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.4.
CVE-2026-103626 Critical · 9.6 CWE-863 Oct 2, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Google Chrome
Incorrect authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-104443 High · 8.1 CWE-863 Oct 2, 2026
YesWiki before 4.6.7 Scope Bypass via Triples Delete API
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic triples regardless of ownership. Attackers can send an empty filter to the triples delete endpoint to remove the admins-group membership triple, emptying the admin group and causing a site-wide authorization lockout.
CVE-2026-82358 Medium · 6.5 CWE-863 Oct 1, 2026
RT-Labs AB C-Open CANopen SDO Server Write Protection Bypass
RT-Labs AB C-Open CANopen contains a write protection bypass in the SDO (Service Data Object) server implementation 'src/co_sdo_server.c' that fails to properly validate write permissions when processing download-segment frames. An unauthenticated attacker on the CAN bus can initiate an SDO upload for a read-only Object Dictionary (OD) entry, which sets a data pointer to the read-only object, then send download-segment frames to write to that memory location. The download-segment handler does not verify that a download session is active, allowing any CANopen node to overwrite read-only OD entries using two SDO frames. Note that CANopen protocol operates over CAN bus and does not provide built-in authentication mechanisms. Fixed in 1.1.1.
CVE-2026-103758 High · 8.1 CWE-863 Oct 1, 2026
Obot 0.21.1 through 0.24.1 Authorization Bypass via /mcp-connect-composite/ Route
Obot 0.21.1 through 0.24.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to reach MCP servers because the checkUI deny list omits the /mcp-connect-composite/ route. Basic-role users with a composite MCP ID can proxy requests through mcpGateway.Proxy to invoke tools on MCP servers restricted by Access Control Rules.
CVE-2026-103284 Medium · 4.3 CWE-863 Oct 1, 2026
Ghost 5.125.1 before 6.57.1 Information Disclosure via Feedback
Ghost versions from 5.125.1 before 6.57.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Admin Feedback endpoint that allows unauthorized staff users to access member data. Attackers with staff privileges can query the feedback endpoint to retrieve sensitive member information without proper authorization checks.
CVE-2026-103273 Medium · 4.3 CWE-863 Oct 1, 2026
Ghost 4.3.0 before 6.58.0 Incorrect Authorization via Staff Token
Ghost versions 4.3.0 before 6.58.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where lower-privilege staff users can use staff tokens to bypass post editing restrictions. Attackers with staff credentials can leverage tokens to edit posts beyond their assigned privilege level.
CVE-2026-103271 High · 7.5 CWE-863 Oct 1, 2026
Ghost 4.0.0 before 6.63.0 Restricted Content Bypass
Ghost versions from 4.0.0 before 6.63.0 contain a content API vulnerability that allows unauthenticated visitors to access gated post content. Attackers can bypass content restrictions by directly querying the content API to retrieve restricted posts without authentication.
CVE-2026-103266 High · 7.1 CWE-863 Oct 1, 2026
Ghost 5.2.0 before 6.62.0 Unauthenticated Stripe Checkout Account Modification
Ghost versions 5.2.0 through versions prior to 6.62.0 allow a remote attacker, without authentication, to abuse the Stripe Checkout flow to attach a paid subscription to an existing member, modify that member's name, and inject content into newsletters sent to the member. Depending on the recipient's email client, the injected content may be rendered, resulting in HTML injection or cross-site scripting (XSS).