CVE Intelligence
Home / CVEs

CVE Database

Published vulnerabilities with severity, known exploitation and official sources.

Severity
Clear

3.573 result(s)

Export this search: RSS · CSV · STIX
CVE-2026-77784 Low · 2.7 CWE-639 Sep 2, 2026
Rank Math SEO < 1.0.277 - Author+ Robots and Pillar Content Meta Update on Non-Owned Objects via mark_page_as
The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not verify that a user is allowed to edit the object being modified before updating its SEO indexing metadata, allowing users with the Author role and above to alter that metadata on content, taxonomy terms and user profiles they do not own, and to remove other users' content from the site's sitemap and search engine index.
CVE-2026-77783 Low · 3.7 CWE-639 Sep 2, 2026
Rank Math SEO < 1.0.277 - Unauthenticated Non-Public Post Schema and Content Disclosure
The Rank Math SEO WordPress plugin before 1.0.277 does not verify that the post whose schema it renders on the front end is publicly viewable, allowing unauthenticated visitors to disclose the schema and associated content of draft, pending, private, scheduled and password-protected posts.
CVE-2026-84438 Low · 3.5 CWE-79 Sep 1, 2026
OpenCart Autocomplete Workflow edit.php cross site scripting
A vulnerability was determined in OpenCart 4.1.0.3/4.1.0.4. This affects an unknown function of the file catalog/controller/account/edit.php of the component Autocomplete Workflow. This manipulation of the argument firstname causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-84437 Low · 3.5 CWE-79 Sep 1, 2026
OpenCart Autocomplete Workflow address.php cross site scripting
A vulnerability was found in OpenCart 4.1.0.3/4.1.0.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file catalog/controller/account/address.php of the component Autocomplete Workflow. The manipulation of the argument address_1 results in cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-84359 Low · 3.1 CWE-200 Sep 1, 2026
Exposure of Sensitive Information in Google Chrome
Information leak in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2026-84355 Low · 3.1 CWE-863 Sep 1, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Google Chrome
Incorrect authorization in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-84331 Low · 3.1 CWE-863 Sep 1, 2026
Incorrect Authorization in Google Chrome
Incorrect authorization in Actor in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2026-84328 Low · 3.1 CWE-862 Sep 1, 2026
Missing Authorization in Google Chrome
Missing authorization in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
CVE-2026-84368 Low · 3.7 CWE-1321 Sep 1, 2026
joi: Prototype pollution via a `__proto__` language key in custom messages
joi is a schema description language and data validator for JavaScript. From 16.0.0 until 17.13.6 and 18.2.5, the @hapi/joi package through 17.1.1 and the successor joi package contain prototype pollution in lib/messages.js, where exports.compile() and exports.merge() reuse inherited objects for attacker-controlled language keys supplied through messages(), message(), prefs({ messages }), Joi.extend({ messages }), or rule({ message }). A language key named __proto__ writes properties onto Object.prototype, and constructor writes to the Object function's static properties. A consuming application that gates on the presence of an inherited property can take the wrong branch for every inspected object. The flaw is not reachable from data that joi validates and requires an application to feed untrusted input directly into schema-construction configuration. This issue is fixed in joi versions 17.13.6 and 18.2.5; no fixed @hapi/joi version is available.
CVE-2026-84367 Low · 3.7 CWE-1321 Sep 1, 2026
joi: object().rename() with a template target can set the validated object's prototype
joi is a schema description language and data validator for JavaScript. From 16.0.0 until 17.13.5 and 18.2.4, joi's lib/types/keys.js internals.rename() implementation used by object().rename() permits a schema that renames keys with a regular-expression source and a Joi.expression() or Joi.x() target that interpolates the pattern's own match data, combined with { multiple: true }, to derive a target from an attacker-controlled input key. An attacker can send x-__proto__ with an object value, causing the target to render as __proto__ and set the prototype of the object returned by validate() instead of creating an own key. The global Object.prototype is not modified, so the effect is confined to the object returned by that validation call. Static-string targets and schemas using the default { multiple: false } are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 17.13.5 and 18.2.4.
CVE-2026-84311 Low · 3.3 CWE-834 Sep 1, 2026
pypdf: Possible long runtimes/large memory usage when extracting XForm objects
pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.16.1, an attacker can craft a PDF that causes pypdf/_page.py PageObject._extract_text and PageObject.extract_xform_text to traverse a directed acyclic graph of reused form XObjects in which each form invokes a child multiple times, creating exponentially many traversal paths and causing long runtimes and large memory consumption. This issue is fixed in version 6.16.1.
CVE-2026-84310 Low · 3.3 CWE-405 Sep 1, 2026
pypdf: Possible long runtimes/large memory usage when retrieving outlines
pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.16.1, an attacker can craft a PDF that causes pypdf/_doc_common.py _get_outline to consume long runtimes and large amounts of memory when retrieving document outlines with large numbers of entries or deeply nested reused paths because the traversal lacked global entry-count and nesting-depth limits. This issue is fixed in version 6.16.1.
CVE-2026-84307 Low · 3.7 CWE-204 Sep 1, 2026
Filament: Password validity disclosure for accounts denied panel access on login page
Filament is a collection of full-stack components for accelerated Laravel development. From 4.0.0 until 4.12.5 and 5.7.5, packages/panels/src/Auth/Pages/Login.php presents the multi-factor authentication challenge before evaluating canAccessPanel(). For an account that canAccessPanel() denies, submitting the correct password renders the MFA challenge while an incorrect password returns the generic authentication failure, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to confirm whether a candidate password is valid for that account. When email-based MFA is configured, the correct-password path also sends a login code to the account holder. The issue applies only to accounts that have MFA enabled and are denied panel access. Authentication is not bypassed because canAccessPanel() still runs after the challenge, and no session is created. This issue is fixed in versions 4.12.5 and 5.7.5.
CVE-2026-73748 Low · 2.2 CWE-312 Sep 1, 2026
Authenticated Sensitive Information Disclosure in HPE Networking Fabric Composer
A vulnerability in the affected interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer allows an attacker with administrative privileges to access sensitive information in a cleartext format. A successful exploit allows an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking Fabric Composer.
CVE-2026-73747 Low · 2.5 CWE-269 Sep 1, 2026
Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability in HPE Networking Fabric Composer
A local privilege-escalation vulnerability has been discovered in HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user with local access to elevate their user privileges and make limited modifications on the affected system.
CVE-2026-73746 Low · 3.1 CWE-400 Sep 1, 2026
Authenticated Denial of Service Vulnerability in HPE Networking Fabric Composer API
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer that could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service.
CVE-2026-73745 Low · 3.1 CWE-200 Sep 1, 2026
Unauthenticated Limited Information Disclosure allows Data Exposure in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer
A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to view some information handled by the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain insight into internal services and workflows, increasing the risk of unauthorized access when combined with other vulnerabilities.
CVE-2026-73744 Low · 3.5 CWE-400 Sep 1, 2026
Authenticated Denial of Service Vulnerability in HPE Networking Fabric Composer Web-Based Management Interface
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer that could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected interface.
CVE-2026-73743 Low · 3.7 CWE-319 Sep 1, 2026
Unauthenticated Information Disclosure Leading to Data Exposure in HPE Networking Fabric Composer
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain insight into some data handled by the affected interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to gain access to some data in a cleartext format possibly exposing other network infrastructure to further compromise.
CVE-2026-81846 Low · 3.5 CWE-639 Sep 1, 2026
runZero MCP 'Findings summaries' Data Leak
An authorization bypass in the runZero Platform MCP service has been resolved in version 5.1.260826.0. This issue is an instance of CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N (3.5 Low).
CVE-2026-52295 Low · 2.9 CWE-125 Sep 1, 2026
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Ffmpeg v.7.0 and after allows an attacker to cause a denial of...
FFmpeg before 9.0 has an out-of-bounds read because the copied extradata lacked required padding before GetBitContext-based access in libavformat/iamf_writer.c.
CVE-2023-54356 Low · 3.7 CWE-326 Sep 1, 2026
Kyverno before 1.9.5 Sweet32 Medium Strength Cipher Suites
Kyverno versions 1.9.4 and earlier support insecure 3DES cipher suites (TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA and TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA) on their TLS endpoints. These 64-bit block ciphers are vulnerable to the Sweet32 attack (CVE-2016-2183), which, over very long-lived TLS connections carrying large volumes of traffic, could allow an attacker to recover small amounts of plaintext. The issue is fixed in Kyverno 1.9.5 and 1.10.0.
CVE-2026-82748 Low · 2.1 CWE-863 Sep 1, 2026
Ash.Actions.Aggregate authorizes an aggregate under one action but computes it under another
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash authorizes an aggregate under one read action while computing it under another, so an aggregate can run with policies that do not match the action it was authorized against. Ash.Actions.Aggregate groups aggregates by their {authorize?, read_action} and authorizes each group under that read action, but when building the data query it selected the action as opts[:action] || read_action || <primary read> (lib/ash/actions/aggregate.ex). When a caller passed an :action option, the aggregate query ran under that action while authorization had been computed for the group's own read_action. If the run action's read policies are more permissive than the authorized one, the aggregate (a count or sum) is computed over records the authorized action's policies would have excluded, disclosing information about data the actor cannot read. The fix runs the aggregate under the same read_action it is authorized against. This issue affects ash: from 3.5.13 before 3.32.2.
CVE-2026-82744 Low · 2.1 CWE-636 Sep 1, 2026
Ash.Reactor change step fails open, skipping a change when its where guard raises
Not Failing Securely (Failing Open) vulnerability in ash-project ash skips an Ash.Reactor change when the guard controlling it raises, so a change meant to run does not. An Ash.Reactor change step can be gated by where validations that decide whether the change runs. Ash.Reactor.ChangeStep (lib/ash/reactor/steps/change_step.ex) evaluated those guards in apply_where_clauses/3, and apply_validation rescued any exception into {:error, error}. The reduce treated that identically to a guard whose condition was simply not met and bypassed the change. So when a guard raises (for example on attacker-influenced input), a change that enforces a security-relevant modification is skipped rather than failing the step. The fix distinguishes a raised exception (now {:raised, error}) and halts the step with an error, failing closed. This issue affects ash: from 3.0.0-rc.17 before 3.32.2.
CVE-2026-82743 Low · 2.1 CWE-400 Sep 1, 2026
Ash.Actions.Read.AsyncLimiter busy-spins a scheduler while awaiting slow async reads
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in ash-project ash lets a slow asynchronous read spin a scheduler thread at full CPU while the framework waits for it. Ash.Actions.Read.AsyncLimiter.await_at_least_one/1 (lib/ash/actions/read/async_limiter.ex) waited for concurrent async read tasks by polling each with Task.yield(task, 0) in a tight loop rather than blocking. While every outstanding task is still running (a slow related-data load or calculation), the loop returns immediately and repeats, busy-spinning and holding a BEAM scheduler at full CPU for the whole duration of the slow read; concurrent slow reads tie up further schedulers. The fix waits with Task.yield_many (a non-blocking sweep followed by a blocking wait with timeout: :infinity), so the process sleeps until a task completes instead of spinning. This issue affects ash: from 2.19.0 before 3.32.2.