Langflow vulnerabilities
Published CVEs affecting Langflow products: 178 record(s), with severity, exploitation and fixes.
CVE-2026-19303
High · 8.1
CWE-22 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary file write and arbitrary file deletion due to unvalidated paths in file-processing components
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary local files or directories due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
CVE-2026-19302
Medium · 6.5
CWE-22 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary local file read due to path traversal in ChatInput, bundle FileInput, and GitExtractor components
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of symbolic links.
CVE-2026-19301
Medium · 6.5
CWE-918 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing or bypassable URL validation in multiple components
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery.
CVE-2026-19300
High · 7.5
CWE-200 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to information disclosure due to cross-user MCP tool cache collision and incomplete secret scrubbing on public flows
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to incomplete scrubbing of sensitive credential fields.
CVE-2026-19299
Medium · 6.5
CWE-22 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary local file read due to path traversal in ChatInput, bundle FileInput, and GitExtractor components
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to path traversal.
CVE-2026-19298
High · 8.8
CWE-94 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to remote code execution due to authorization policy bypass in the authenticated flow-build endpoint
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an authorization bypass in the flow build process.
CVE-2026-9186
Medium · 6.5
CWE-284 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting and IP spoofing due to unsanitized Markdown rendering and untrusted proxy header trust
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 allows remote authenticated attackers to bypass localhost-only MCP configuration installation by spoofing X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1 header, enabling arbitrary writes to IDE config files (~/.cursor/mcp.json, etc.).
CVE-2026-9138
Medium · 6.5
CWE-22 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary file write and arbitrary file deletion due to unvalidated paths in file-processing components
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 Langflow could allow an authenticated attacker to write arbitrary files to the server due to improper input validation in the SaveToFileComponent. The application constructs local file paths using attacker‑controlled input without sufficient sanitization when handling requests to the /api/v1/run/{flow_id} endpoint. An attacker with low‑privileged authenticated access (such as a valid API key or user session) can supply crafted path values, including absolute paths or path traversal sequences, allowing arbitrary file writes to locations writable by the Langflow process. Successful exploitation may lead to unauthorized file creation or modification, potentially resulting in further compromise depending on the deployment environment.
CVE-2026-8447
Medium · 6.1
CWE-79 Sep 4, 2026
Langflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting and IP spoofing due to unsanitized Markdown rendering and untrusted proxy header trust
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 suffer from a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Playground chat interface.
CVE-2026-19295
Critical · 9.9
CWE-95 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities due to insufficient code-execution policy enforcement
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands in the server process by saving a flow with a crafted type field value and triggering a build of a wrapper flow that references it. This allowed privilege escalation from "authenticated flow user" to arbitrary OS-level command execution under the server process identity, bypassing the LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false policy control.
CVE-2026-19294
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute and read any user's private flow due to improper authorization.
CVE-2026-19286
Critical · 9.8
CWE-94 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities due to insufficient code-execution policy enforcement
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper enforcement of security restrictions on the A2A public endpoint.
CVE-2026-18904
High · 8.2
CWE-639 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject unauthorized messages due to a namespace collision between user identifiers.
CVE-2026-18899
High · 7.5
CWE-22 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to path traversal.
CVE-2026-18891
High · 8.2
CWE-287 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary flows and access sensitive information due to improper authentication.
CVE-2026-18729
High · 8.8
CWE-94 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities due to insufficient code-execution policy enforcement
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code.
CVE-2026-18545
Medium · 4.3
CWE-918 Aug 28, 2026
Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request forgery vulnerabilities
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
CVE-2026-19875
High · 7.5
CWE-306 Aug 19, 2026
Unauthenticated Registration POST Endpoint Permits Admin Email Overwrite and Outbound Relay Abuse in Langflow
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to overwrite administrator email information and abuse the server as an outbound relay due to missing authentication for the registration endpoint.
CVE-2026-19297
Critical · 9.1
CWE-307 Aug 13, 2026
Insufficient Authentication Brute Force Protection on Login Endpoint
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 could allow a remote attacker to obtain unauthorized access to user accounts due to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts.
CVE-2026-9205
Critical · 9.8
CWE-338 Aug 5, 2026
Langflow is affected by weaknesses in secret handling and sensitive configuration access
IBM Langflow OSS contains a weak cryptographic key derivation vulnerability in the ensure_fernet_key() function.
CVE-2026-9201
High · 8.8
CWE-326 Aug 5, 2026
Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA‑256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.
CVE-2026-9196
High · 8.8
CWE-94 Aug 5, 2026
Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute unintended code during Agentic Assistant validation due to improper handling of LLM‑generated components. The application executes model‑generated Python code in the backend during validation prior to user approval, which may allow an attacker to trigger side effects such as outbound network access, file system interaction, or data exfiltration with the privileges of the Langflow backend process.
CVE-2026-9130
High · 7.1
CWE-639 Aug 5, 2026
Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in custom component validation and trusted code enforcement
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the MemoryComponent that allows authenticated users to access chat history of other users via session_id collision. The MemoryComponent.retrieve_messages and store_message methods filter on session_id without validating flow_id or user_id ownership, enabling cross-user information disclosure through multiple authenticated API endpoints including /api/v1/run/*, /api/v1/responses, and /api/v2/workflow/*. This vulnerability only affects multi-user deployments with LANGFLOW_AUTO_LOGIN=False.
CVE-2026-8478
High · 8.8
CWE-94 Aug 5, 2026
Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code.
CVE-2026-8470
Critical · 9.1
CWE-327 Aug 5, 2026
Langflow is affected by weaknesses in secret handling and sensitive configuration access
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 use Python's non-cryptographic random module for generating Fernet encryption keys from user secrets under 32 characters. The deterministic Mersenne Twister PRNG produces identical keys for identical seeds, allowing attackers to reproduce encryption keys and decrypt stored API keys and authentication tokens.