CVE-2010-1871 — Red Hat Linux JBoss Seam 2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

CISA required action CISA

Apply updates per vendor instructions.

US federal deadline: Jun 10, 2022 — passed 1588 day(s) ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Netapp Oncommand Balance, Netapp Oncommand Insight, Netapp Oncommand Unified Manager…).
2. Treat as emergency remediation: the CVE is in CISA KEV (confirmed exploitation).
3. The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
4. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
5. Exploitation requires user interaction: tighten email/web filtering and warn affected users.
6. EPSS ahead of 100% of scored CVEs: prioritize it in the patch queue.
7. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (injection), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-917 · Expression Language Injection

Other CVEs with this weakness →

CISA KEV details CISA

CISA lists a CVE once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a reference date.

Public exploits, PoCs and detection templates

Public code that demonstrates or tests the flaw raises the odds of mass exploitation — and Nuclei templates help find vulnerable assets in your environment.

Warning: public PoCs are sometimes disguised malware. Use them only for authorized testing in an isolated environment. This portal does not host exploit code — it only points to the sources.

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 83.40%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

• Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
• Look for parameters with command/query metacharacters and unexpected child processes of the service.
• Hunt retroactively in logs from before Dec 10, 2021 (KEV listing): exploitation may have started earlier.

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

• 2026
• Affected products added · redhat/jboss enterprise application platform, netapp/oncommand balance, netapp/oncommand insight, netapp/oncommand unifi
  Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
• Source status changed · Published → Analyzed
  Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
• Record published
  Oct 13, 2026
• CVSS changed · 8.8
  Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• Source status changed · → Published
  Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• SSVC assessment updated
  Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• Added to CISA KEV (detected)
  Oct 13, 2026 · CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
• Record created in this database
  Oct 13, 2026 · CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
• 2021
• Added to CISA KEV catalog
  Dec 9, 2021 · CISA
• 2010
• CVE published
  Aug 5, 2010 · mitre

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

• 3× References added · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
• 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

12 on the record

• www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1929
  vdb-entry, x_refsource_VUPEN, Broken Link, Vendor Advisory, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
  US Government Resource, NIST National Vulnerability Database
• www.securitytracker.com/id
  vdb-entry, x_refsource_SECTRACK, Broken Link, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20161017-0001
  GitHub Security Advisories
• nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1871
  GitHub Security Advisories
• www.securityfocus.com/bid/41994
  vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID, Broken Link, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-05/0117.html
  mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ, Broken Link, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
  x_refsource_CONFIRM, Issue Tracking, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• github.com/advisories/GHSA-r6fv-qmrc-3h24
  GitHub Security Advisories
• exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/60794
  vdb-entry, x_refsource_XF, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0564.html
  vendor-advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT, Broken Link, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
• security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20161017-0001/
  x_refsource_CONFIRM, Third Party Advisory, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Elsewhere on this site

Related CVEs (same products)

• Critical CVE-2026-28369 Undertow: undertow: request smuggling via malformed http request headers Mar 27, 2026
• Critical CVE-2026-28368 Undertow: undertow: request smuggling via inconsistent header parsing Mar 27, 2026
• Critical CVE-2026-28367 Undertow: undertow: request smuggling via `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator Mar 27, 2026
• High CVE-2026-3121 Keycloak: org.keycloak/keycloak-services: keycloak: privilege escalation via manage-clients permission Mar 26, 2026
• Low CVE-2026-4874 Org.keycloak.protocol.oidc.grants: org.keycloak.services.managers: keycloak: server-side request forgery via oidc token endpoint manipulation Mar 26, 2026
• Medium CVE-2026-4366 Keycloak-services: blind server-side request forgery (ssrf) via http redirect handling in keycloak Mar 18, 2026

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

• No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
• No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
• No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
• No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2010-1871 is "Red Hat Linux JBoss Seam 2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", rated High. It affects Oncommand Balance (Netapp); versions are in the scope table. It is in CISA KEV: there is evidence of real-world exploitation. CVSS 8.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 83.40% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.