CVE Intelligence
Medium Access control

CVE-2025-14095 — Privilege boundary violation in Radiometer Products

A "Privilege boundary violation" vulnerability is identified affecting multiple Radiometer Products. Exploitation of this vulnerability gives a user with physical access to the analyzer, the possibility to gain unauthorized access to functionalities outside the restricted environment. The vulnerability is due to weakness in the design of access control implementation in application software.  Other related CVE's are CVE-2025-14096 & CVE-2025-14097. Affected customers have been informed about this vulnerability. This CVE is being published to provide transparency. Required configuration for Exposure: Physical access to the analyzer is needed. Temporary work Around: Only authorized people can physically access the analyzer. Permanent solution: Local Radiometer representatives will contact all affected customers to discuss a permanent solution. Exploit Status: Researchers have provided working proof-of-concept. Radiometer is not aware of any publicly available exploit at the time of publication.                                                                                                                                                                                        Note: CVSS score 6.8 when underlying OS is Windows 7 or Windows XP Operating systems and CVSS score 5.7 when underlying OS is Windows 8 or Windows 10 operating systems.

Published Dec 17, 2025 · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · Sources: NIST National Vulnerability Database, CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP · CNA: Radiometer

Who exploits it and how urgent it is

A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.

No exploitation signal in the sources consulted so far.
How the score was calculated
  • EPSS 0.2% (30-day exploitation probability)+1
  • Technical severity (medium)+3

The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.

Exploitation
Not confirmed
Not in CISA KEV — an absence of record, not proof it is unexploited.
EPSS FIRST
0.17%
ahead of 6% of scored CVEs · Oct 15, 2026
Affects
Radiometer Medical Aps
ABL800 BASIC and ABL800 FLEX analyzers and 3 more
CVSS base
6.8
Medium · 2 source(s)

CISA SSVC assessment CISA

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script the kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.

No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.

  1. Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Radiometer Medical Aps ABL800 BASIC and ABL800 FLEX analyzers, Radiometer Medical Aps ABL9 Analyzers, Radiometer Medical Aps ABL90 FLEX and ABL90 FLEX PLUS Analyzers…).
  2. No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
  3. Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (access control), errors and authentication anomalies.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatusSource
Radiometer Medical Aps ABL800 BASIC and ABL800 FLEX analyzers version Application software versions < 6.20 MR2 with Windows 7, Windows XP as underlyinversion Application software versions < 6.20 MR2 with Windows 10 as underlying OS Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Radiometer Medical Aps ABL9 Analyzers version Application software versions < 1.5.0 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Radiometer Medical Aps ABL90 FLEX and ABL90 FLEX PLUS Analyzers version All application software versions with Windows 7, Windows XP as underlying OSversion Application software versions < 3.5MR11 with Windows 10 as underlying OS Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
Radiometer Medical Aps AQT90 FLEX Analyzers version All Application software versions <= 8.13 MR2 Vulnerable CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Attack vector
Physical
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactScored by
6.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium 0.9 5.9 46b595e9-1acc-41cb-9398-adaf98d37a9b via NIST National Vulnerability Database
6.8 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — Radiometer via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
5.7 CVSS 3.1 Medium — — Radiometer via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (score shown at the top: 46b595e9-1acc-41cb-9398-adaf98d37a9b)
Sources assign different scores within the same severity band. For prioritization we use 6.8 (46b595e9-1acc-41cb-9398-adaf98d37a9b via NIST National Vulnerability Database) as a conservative provisional reference — not a definitive official score.

Weakness MITRE

Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.

CWE-284 · Improper Access Control

Other CVEs with this weakness →

EPSS over time FIRST

Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 15, 2026 · 3 reading(s) · max 0.17%

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.

  • Local/physical vector: focus on endpoint telemetry (EDR) from affected hosts.
  • Audit administrative actions and access to resources outside each user’s normal pattern.
endpoint telemetry (EDR)authentication logsapplication logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first.

  • 2026
  • Affected products added · radiometer medical aps/abl90 flex and abl90 flex plus analyzers, radiometer medical aps/aqt90 flex analyzers, radiometer
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • SSVC assessment updated
    Oct 13, 2026 · CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP
  • Record published
    Oct 13, 2026
  • CVSS changed · 6.8
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Source status changed · → Deferred
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • Record created in this database
    Oct 13, 2026 · NIST National Vulnerability Database
  • 2025
  • CVE published
    Dec 17, 2025 · Radiometer

Source activity

Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.

  • 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Radiometer Medical Aps
every CVE for this vendor
Access control
same class
CWE-284
other pages naming this weakness

Related CVEs (same products)

  • CVE-2025-14097 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Radiometer Products Dec 17, 2025
  • CVE-2025-14096 Credential Disclosure vulnerability in Radiometer Products Dec 17, 2025

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record

Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2025-14095 is "Privilege boundary violation in Radiometer Products", rated Medium. It affects ABL800 BASIC and ABL800 FLEX analyzers (Radiometer Medical Aps); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 6.8 describes technical severity. EPSS 0.17% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.

Comments

Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.

No comments yet.

Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.