CVE-2026-21637 — Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Nodejs Node
A flaw in Node.js TLS error handling allows remote attackers to crash or exhaust resources of a TLS server when `pskCallback` or `ALPNCallback` are in use. Synchronous exceptions thrown during these callbacks bypass standard TLS error handling paths (tlsClientError and error), causing either immediate process termination or silent file descriptor leaks that eventually lead to denial of service. Because these callbacks process attacker-controlled input during the TLS handshake, a remote client can repeatedly trigger the issue. This vulnerability affects TLS servers using PSK or ALPN callbacks across Node.js versions where these callbacks throw without being safely wrapped.
Who exploits it and how urgent it is
A 0–100 score combining confirmed exploitation, ransomware and APT use, public exploits, EPSS and severity.
How the score was calculated
- EPSS 1.1% (30-day exploitation probability)+10
- Technical severity (high)+6
- Automatable exploitation (SSVC)+3
The score orders the patch queue; it does not replace your asset context (internet exposure, criticality, compensating controls).
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the sources call it.
CISA SSVC assessment CISA
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses (SSVC 2.0.3). A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Remediation
Fixes and mitigations documented by the sources — linked to the original advisory.
No fix documented by the sources we poll. That does not mean none exists: check the vendor advisory.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record’s own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found. A rule-generated starting point.
- Identify exposed assets running the affected vendor/product/version combinations (Nodejs Node, Nodejs Node.js).
- The attack is network-based and needs no privileges: restrict exposure (ACLs, VPN, WAF) until patched.
- No fix documented in the sources: reduce exposure and monitor the vendor advisory.
- Search available logs for exploit probes matching the vulnerability class (denial of service), errors and authentication anomalies.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and versions as the sources word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nodejs | Node |
≥ 7.0 and < 7.*≥ 18.0 and < 18.*≥ 17.0 and < 17.*≥ 16.0 and < 16.*≥ 15.0 and < 15.*≥ 14.0 and < 14.*≥ 13.0 and < 13.*≥ 12.0 and < 12.* and 11 more≥ 11.0 and < 11.*≥ 10.0 and < 10.*≥ 9.0 and < 9.*≥ 8.0 and < 8.*≥ 6.0 and < 6.*≥ 5.0 and < 5.*≥ 4.0 and < 4.*≥ 25.2.1 and ≤ 25.2.1≥ 24.12.0 and ≤ 24.12.0≥ 22.21.1 and ≤ 22.21.1≥ 20.19.6 and ≤ 20.19.6 |
Vulnerable | CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
| Nodejs | Node.js | ≥ 4.0.0 and < 20.20.0≥ 25.0.0 and < 25.3.0≥ 24.0.0 and < 24.13.0≥ 22.0.0 and < 22.22.0 | Vulnerable | NIST National Vulnerability Database |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and may disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | CVSS 3.1 | High | 3.9 | 3.6 | nvd@nist.gov via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 5.9 | CVSS 3.0 | Medium | 2.2 | 3.6 | support@hackerone.com via NIST National Vulnerability Database |
| 5.9 | CVSS 3.0 | Medium | — | — | hackerone via CVE Program (cve.org) e CISA ADP |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (score shown at the top: nvd@nist.gov) Weakness MITRE
Weakness class according to MITRE’s CWE catalog.
EPSS over time FIRST
Oct 13, 2026 → Oct 14, 2026 · 2 reading(s) · max 1.14%
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not tested rules.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for the network-reachable component (proxy, WAF, IDS/IPS).
- Track CPU/memory spikes and availability drops correlated with request patterns.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first.
- 2026
- Affected products added · nodejs/node
- SSVC assessment updated
- Record published
- CVSS changed · 7.5
- Source status changed · → Analyzed
- Record created in this database
- CVE published
Source activity
Repeated readings are counted rather than listed.
- 1× Official description updated · Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 13, 2026
References
1 on the record
Elsewhere on this site
Related CVEs (same products)
- High CVE-2026-58043 Improper Access Control in Nodejs Node.js Jul 30, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-56850 Improper Authentication in Nodejs Node.js Jul 30, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-56847 A flaw in Node.js Permission Model enforcement allows `trace_events.createTracing().enabl… Jul 30, 2026
- Low CVE-2026-48936 Improper Access Control in Nodejs Node.js Jun 25, 2026
- Low CVE-2026-48935 Incorrect Default Permissions in Nodejs Node.js Jun 25, 2026
- Medium CVE-2026-48618 A flaw in Node.js TLS hostname handling can cause Node.js unicode dot separator handling… Jun 25, 2026
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No fixed version, patch or mitigation documented.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record
Text assembled only from the fields above — no additional claims.
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-21637 is "Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Nodejs Node", rated High. It affects Node (Nodejs); versions are in the scope table. It is not in CISA KEV, which does not rule out exploitation. CVSS 7.5 describes technical severity. EPSS 1.14% estimates the probability of exploitation in 30 days; neither replaces your asset context. First verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run the affected versions, apply vendor fixes or mitigations, and preserve logs for review.
Comments
Moderated technical discussion. Read the community guidelines.
No comments yet.
Sign in or create an account to comment and suggest corrections.