Tenable vulnerabilities
Published CVEs affecting Tenable products: 60 record(s), with severity, exploitation and fixes.
Security Center 20Nessus 19Tenable.sc 8Nessus Agent 6Log Correlation Engine 4Nessus Network Monitor 3Terrascan 3Agent 2Operational Technology Exposure 1Identity Exposure 1Tenable Nessus, Tenable Nessus Agent 1Tenable Identity Exposure (SaaS) 1Tenable Operation Technology 1Sensor Proxy 1
CVE-2026-47356
High · 8.6
CWE-918 May 19, 2026
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Tenable Terrascan
Terrascan v1.18.3 and prior are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the webhook_url parameter in the file scan endpoint (POST /v1/{iac}/{iacVersion}/{cloud}/local/file/scan) when running in server mode. An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply an arbitrary URL as the webhook_url multipart form parameter. After scanning the uploaded file, Terrascan sends an HTTP POST request to the attacker-controlled URL containing the full scan results as a JSON body, with the attacker-supplied webhook_token forwarded as a Bearer token in the Authorization header. The retryable HTTP client retries up to 10 times on failure. This affects deployments running terrascan in server mode (terrascan server), which binds to 0.0.0.0 with no authentication. Note: Terrascan was archived in August 2023 and no patch will be released.
CVE-2026-33694
High · 7.8
CWE-59 Apr 23, 2026
Junction File Manipulation
This vulnerability allows an attacker to create a junction, enabling the deletion of arbitrary files with SYSTEM privileges. As a result, this condition potentially facilitates arbitrary code execution, whereby an attacker may exploit the vulnerability to execute malicious code with elevated SYSTEM privileges.
CVE-2026-4433
Medium · 4.3
CWE-16 Mar 24, 2026
An SSH misconfigurations exists in Tenable OT that led to the potential exfiltration of…
An SSH misconfigurations exists in Tenable OT that led to the potential exfiltration of socket, port, and service information via the ostunnel user and GatewayPorts. This could be used to potentially glean information about the underlying system and give an attacker information that could be used to attempt to compromise the host.
CVE-2026-2698
Medium · 6.5
CWE-639 Feb 23, 2026
Improper Access Control
An improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated user could access areas outside of their authorized scope.
CVE-2026-2697
High · 8.8
CWE-639 Feb 23, 2026
Indirect Object Reference (IDOR) in Security Center
An Indirect Object Reference (IDOR) in Security Center allows an authenticated remote attacker to escalate privileges via the 'owner' parameter.
CVE-2026-2630
High · 8.8
CWE-78 Feb 17, 2026
[R1] Stand-alone Security Patches Available for Tenable Security Center versions 6.5.1, 6.6.0 and 6.7.2: SC-202602.1 + SC-202602.2
A Command Injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker could execute arbitrary code on the underlying server where Tenable Security Center is hosted.
CVE-2026-2026
Medium · 6.1
CWE-276 Feb 13, 2026
Improper Access Control Allows Denial of Service
A vulnerability has been identified where weak file permissions in the Nessus Agent directory on Windows hosts could allow unauthorized access, potentially permitting Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.
CVE-2025-36640
High · 8.8
CWE-269 Jan 13, 2026
Local Privilege Escalation
A vulnerability has been identified in the installation/uninstallation of the Nessus Agent Tray App on Windows Hosts which could lead to escalation of privileges.
CVE-2025-36636
Medium · 4.3
CWE-284 Oct 8, 2025
Improper Access Control
In Tenable Security Center versions prior to 6.7.0, an improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated user could access areas outside of their authorized scope.
CVE-2022-0778
High · 7.5
CWE-835 Mar 15, 2022
Infinite loop in BN_mod_sqrt() reachable when parsing certificates
The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).
CVE-2022-23990
High · 7.5
CWE-190 Jan 26, 2022
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has an integer overflow in the doProlog function.
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has an integer overflow in the doProlog function.
CVE-2022-23852
Critical · 9.8
CWE-190 Jan 23, 2022
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has a signed integer overflow in XML_GetBuffer, for...
Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has a signed integer overflow in XML_GetBuffer, for configurations with a nonzero XML_CONTEXT_BYTES.
CVE-2022-22827
High · 8.8
CWE-190 Jan 10, 2022
storeAtts in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
storeAtts in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22826
High · 8.8
CWE-190 Jan 10, 2022
nextScaffoldPart in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
nextScaffoldPart in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22825
High · 8.8
CWE-190 Jan 10, 2022
lookup in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
lookup in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22824
Critical · 9.8
CWE-190 Jan 10, 2022
defineAttribute in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
defineAttribute in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22823
Critical · 9.8
CWE-190 Jan 10, 2022
build_model in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
build_model in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2022-22822
Critical · 9.8
CWE-190 Jan 10, 2022
addBinding in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
addBinding in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow.
CVE-2021-46143
High · 7.8
CWE-190 Jan 6, 2022
In doProlog in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, an integer overflow exists for...
In doProlog in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, an integer overflow exists for m_groupSize.
CVE-2021-45960
High · 8.8
CWE-682 Jan 1, 2022
In Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, a left shift by 29 (or more) places in the storeAtts...
In Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3, a left shift by 29 (or more) places in the storeAtts function in xmlparse.c can lead to realloc misbehavior (e.g., allocating too few bytes, or only freeing memory).
CVE-2021-40438
Critical · 9.0
KEV Urgent · 83 Public exploit Ransomware CWE-918 Sep 16, 2021
Apache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.
CVE-2021-3711
Critical · 9.8
CWE-120 Aug 24, 2021
SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).
CVE-2021-3450
High · 7.4
CWE-295 Mar 25, 2021
CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
CVE-2021-3449
Medium · 5.9
CWE-476 Mar 25, 2021
NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
CVE-2020-11023
Medium · 6.1
KEV High · 67 Public exploit CWE-79 Apr 29, 2020
JQuery Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability
In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.