Siemens vulnerabilities
Published CVEs affecting Siemens products: 316 record(s), with severity, exploitation and fixes.
Sinec Infrastructure Network Services 38Sinema Remote Connect Server 22Solid Edge Se2025 16Simcenter Femap 15SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515-2 PN 14SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PN 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DP 14SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1510SP-1 PN 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PN 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PN 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1515F-2 PN 14SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PN 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PN 14SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1510SP F-1 PN 14SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DP 14Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware 13SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516F-3 PN/DP 13SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1516-3 PN/DP 13SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PN 13SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP F-1 PN 13SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1513-1 PN 13SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511-1 PN 13SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1511F-1 PN 13SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1513F-1 PN 13SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller CPU 1508S V2 12SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller CPU 1508S F V4 12SIPLUS ET 200SP CPU 1512SP-1 PN 12SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1514SP-2 PN 12SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller CPU 1507S F V3 12SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller CPU 1508S V3 12Sinec Ins 12SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP 12SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP 12SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP 12SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller CPU 1508S TF V3 12SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518TF-4 PN/DP 12SIMATIC S7-1500 ET 200pro: CPU 1513PRO-2 PN 12SIMATIC ET 200SP CPU 1514SPT-2 PN 12SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1512C-1 PN 12
CVE-2019-19244
High · 7.5
Nov 25, 2019
sqlite3Select in select.c in SQLite 3.30.1 allows a crash if a sub-select uses both DISTINCT and...
sqlite3Select in select.c in SQLite 3.30.1 allows a crash if a sub-select uses both DISTINCT and window functions, and also has certain ORDER BY usage.
CVE-2019-16905
High · 7.8
CWE-190 Oct 9, 2019
OpenSSH 7.7 through 7.9 and 8.x before 8.1, when compiled with an experimental key type, has a...
OpenSSH 7.7 through 7.9 and 8.x before 8.1, when compiled with an experimental key type, has a pre-authentication integer overflow if a client or server is configured to use a crafted XMSS key. This leads to memory corruption and local code execution because of an error in the XMSS key parsing algorithm. NOTE: the XMSS implementation is considered experimental in all released OpenSSH versions, and there is no supported way to enable it when building portable OpenSSH.
CVE-2019-0708
Critical · 9.8
KEV Urgent · 93 Public exploit Ransomware CWE-416 May 16, 2019
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests, aka 'Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.
CVE-2019-6111
Medium · 5.9
Public exploit CWE-22 Jan 31, 2019
An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp...
An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file).
CVE-2019-6110
Medium · 6.8
Public exploit CWE-838 Jan 31, 2019
In OpenSSH 7.9, due to accepting and displaying arbitrary stderr output from the server, a...
In OpenSSH 7.9, due to accepting and displaying arbitrary stderr output from the server, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can manipulate the client output, for example to use ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred.
CVE-2019-6109
Medium · 6.8
CWE-116 Jan 31, 2019
An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display...
An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can employ crafted object names to manipulate the client output, e.g., by using ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred. This affects refresh_progress_meter() in progressmeter.c.
CVE-2017-5689
Critical · 9.8
KEV Urgent · 83 Public exploit CWE-269 May 2, 2017
Intel Active Management Technology (AMT), Small Business Technology (SBT), and Standard Manageability Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) and Intel Standard Manageability (ISM). An unprivileged local attacker could provision manageability features gaining unprivileged network or local system privileges on Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT), Intel Standard Manageability (ISM), and Intel Small Business Technology (SBT).
CVE-2017-0144
High · 8.8
KEV Urgent · 86 Public exploit Ransomware Mar 16, 2017
Microsoft SMBv1 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.
CVE-2017-0145
High · 8.8
KEV Urgent · 86 Public exploit Ransomware Mar 16, 2017
Microsoft SMBv1 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.
CVE-2017-0146
High · 8.8
KEV Urgent · 86 Public exploit Ransomware Mar 16, 2017
Microsoft Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0148.
CVE-2017-0148
High · 8.1
KEV Urgent · 86 Public exploit Ransomware CWE-20 Mar 16, 2017
Microsoft SMBv1 Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146.
CVE-2017-0147
High · 7.5
KEV Urgent · 89 Public exploit Ransomware Mar 16, 2017
Microsoft Windows SMBv1 Information Disclosure Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
CVE-2017-0143
High · 8.8
KEV Urgent · 86 Public exploit Ransomware Mar 16, 2017
Microsoft Windows Server Message Block (SMBv1) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.
CVE-2016-8562
High · 7.5
KEV High · 54 Nov 18, 2016
Siemens SIMATIC CP 1543-1 Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28). Under special conditions it was possible to write SNMP variables on port 161/udp which should be read-only and should only be configured with TIA-Portal. A write to these variables could reduce the availability or cause a denial-of-service.
CVE-2014-0160
High · 7.5
KEV Urgent · 79 Public exploit CWE-125 Apr 7, 2014
OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.
CVE-2011-3389
Medium · 4.3
Public exploit CWE-326 Sep 6, 2011
Inadequate Encryption Strength in Google Chrome
The SSL protocol, as used in certain configurations in Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Opera, and other products, encrypts data by using CBC mode with chained initialization vectors, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext HTTP headers via a blockwise chosen-boundary attack (BCBA) on an HTTPS session, in conjunction with JavaScript code that uses (1) the HTML5 WebSocket API, (2) the Java URLConnection API, or (3) the Silverlight WebClient API, aka a "BEAST" attack.